Critic Reviews



Based on 18 critic reviews provided by Metacritic.com
Young Guns II generates more sheer visual excitement than any Western since Peckinpah and Leone were in their last '70s prime.
An affectionate and entertaining tribute to the Western - but, Estevez aside, Young Guns II doesn't exactly add much to the old genre.
Although it's more ambitious than most sequels, Young Guns II exhausts its most inspired moment during the opening credits and fades into a copy of its 1988 predecessor - a slick, glossy MTV-style western.
The screenplay feels unfinished, the direction is ambling, but the performances are interesting.
Young Guns II concentrates principally on the drawing power of the post-adolescent heartthrobs in its cast. This approach has its appeal in limited doses, but it makes for a western that's smaller than life.
A far more stylistically assured film than its fey predecessor, though it still carries almost no conviction.
Whenever a few of the Young Guns get together and have to behave like soulful cowboys, the movie stops dead in its tracks. The trouble with so many of today’s young actors is that there’s no deep-seated yearning or fury in their performances. They just seem like well-adjusted California kids putting on a show for a few hours.
Time Out
The plot is all pot-shots and posses, with a bit of Indian hocus-pocus thrown in for comic relief. In other words, more of the same.
Besides featuring some of the same actors in the same roles, what this six-gun sequel has in common with Young Guns is that it is wholly unmemorable.
The first Young Guns, in 1988, was an endurance test for all but those who think ogling young actors in tight britches is a fascinating way to spend two hours. Though it seems impossible, the sequel is even more excruciating.

More Critic Reviews

See all external reviews for Young Guns II (1990) »

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Reviews | User Ratings | External Reviews

Recently Viewed