Katinka (1988) Poster

(1988)

User Reviews

Review this title
2 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
5/10
90 minutes & 180 repetitions by the audience of one question: Are you ever going to get interesting, movie?
TBJCSKCNRRQTreviews26 April 2010
If someone actually did invent a machine that made time pass at a lower rate than it does, giving us longer lives, he would be celebrated. When it is a film, however, that makes it appear as though it's twice(or more) its running time by virtue of moving at a snail's pace, we're less enthusiastic. I borrowed this from the library(fairly quickly, too, what a wonder that no one else wanted it) to make sure I hadn't missed anything, since we read the novel for Danish class(honestly, could the exam situation be threatening to a greater degree than it is? Possibly if loaded weapons were aimed at you during your presentation and subsequent dialog with the teacher and censor, and even then, I'm not sure it would be), and, well, it's nearly entirely physical description and dialog(in Jutlandic, no less), no narration, and you have to pay close attention(it was written a number of years ago, as well) to figure out what is actually going on(this is easier, of course, as you can see it). Bang did succeed, though; it is not a boring read. It's vivid and rich, you can "sense" the stuff he's telling us of, exactly as he intended. And that's why, while it shouldn't, it surprised me that this was so flat, and essentially the opposite of what I've just said about the source material(it follows the plot, cutting it down somewhat). This elicits next to no emotional response, other than occasionally annoyance. It's not poor from a technical standpoint, if it feels "empty". This tries to inject dumb, silly humor. There is good acting in this; Nørbye clearly makes an effort, and she's not the only one. This has far less characterization than the original. All of these are the same problems as many of our pictures, maybe especially the ones that are based on books and are from this period of time. Still, this remains a particularly bad case. No, what Herman gave us wasn't a screenplay, but it was already cinematic in its language. Perhaps the fault lies in the direction; this is the first and only attempt Sydow has made at such. Hopefully it can serve as a warning to others. And the punishment for anyone else who screws up that job. There is a little disturbing content and a couple of mature themes in this. I recommend this solely to those who refuse to accept my words on this being slow, not engaging and a waste of an hour and a half. 5/10
1 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Tired and slow
skagarack17 January 2007
Warning: Spoilers
We saw this movie in school in Danish class... and it's been a very long time since a movie bored me this much.... It's based on a novel by Danish author Hermann Bang who lived in the 19th century... and the movie clearly shows that the story it's based on is a 100 years old... The movie gets tired and old after a few minutes and you just don't want to go on with it.... Unfortunately I had too....

Well, a married woman falls in love with a new man in town and he with her. They can't realize their love though because of her marriage and the time this takes place. Sounds like something you've seen before?? You probably have... and way better! Avoid this. Other Danish movies of the 80's have done well against the hands of time, but this was slow even when it was released.
0 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed