Andrew and Vicky McGee met while earning money as guinea pigs for an experiment at college. The experiment was shrouded in suspicion and mystery, and seemed to be related to psychic abilities. The two were married and had a daughter, Charlie, who has the ability to start fires by merely thinking about it, also known as pyrokinesis. Naturally, the government takes a great interest in Charlie, and operatives from the secret department known as "The Shop" want to quarantine and study her.Written by
Murray Chapman <firstname.lastname@example.org>
All of the film's special effects were all done on set as there was no CGI during this time. Everything was done with the use of real fire, remote controlled prostethetics. wires, gas lines and actual stunt people. See more »
When Cap Hollister is first in the room with Charlie, the door behind him is open over his left shoulder after he had closed it. Then when the camera shot changes again the door is closed. See more »
Doctor Joseph Wanless:
Ever since this child was born, her father has been trying to inhibit her use of those powers. But what if his control had weakened now?
Why would he lose control, now, after all those years?
Doctor Joseph Wanless:
Ask yourself this question. How exhausting must it have been for Victoria and Andrew McGee when this child was an infant? The bottle is late, the baby cries, and at that moment, one of her toys right there in the crib beside her bursts into smokey flame.
Joe, she's just a little girl. She can light fires, ...
[...] See more »
[unused disclaimer, written for end titles; ended up on cutting-room floor] FIRESTARTER contains a purely fictional account of a small group of ruthless and corrupt scientific researchers and national-intelligence agents. These characters do not represent the United States government, and it would be erroneous and unfair to suggest that they do. The vast majority of North American intelligence and research personnel have demonstrated the utmost moral sense, regard for civilian welfare, and worthiness of the public trust. See more »
FIRESTARTER has some interesting moments. It has some good scenes. From a historical account perspective, it certainly is a milestone both for Stephen King (and the phenomenon of his books being adapted to film) as well as for Drew Barrymore, who stars here in one of her very young roles.
The acting is not great. There are times when it could be better and you think they probably should have done another take until you realize that it probably took them all day just to get it as good as they did, which is not good at all. You can't really blame an actor that young though. Ultimately, it feels like they made this movie just for money, and their hearts were not in it. It has that feel to it. It's bad in that way. And it's too long and too boring. Do not recommend.
1 of 1 people found this review helpful.
Was this review helpful to you?
| Report this