6.7/10
324,195
475 user 366 critic

In Time (2011)

Trailer
2:28 | Trailer

Watch Now

From $2.99 (SD) on Amazon Video

ON TV
ON DISC
ALL
In a future where people stop aging at 25, but are engineered to live only one more year, having the means to buy your way out of the situation is a shot at immortal youth. Here, Will Salas finds himself accused of murder and on the run with a hostage - a connection that becomes an important part of the way against the system.

Director:

Writer:

Reviews
Popularity
754 ( 460)
2 nominations. See more awards »

Videos

Photos

Edit

Cast

Cast overview, first billed only:
...
...
Rachel Salas
...
...
Borel
...
Citizen
...
...
...
...
Nick Lashaway ...
...
...
Victa
...
Zuleyka Silver ...
Pasha
...
Sagita
Edit

Storyline

Welcome to a world where time has become the ultimate currency. You stop aging at 25, but there's a catch: you're genetically-engineered to live only one more year, unless you can buy your way out of it. The rich "earn" decades at a time (remaining at age 25), becoming essentially immortal, while the rest beg, borrow or steal enough hours to make it through the day. When a man from the wrong side of the tracks is falsely accused of murder, he is forced to go on the run with a beautiful hostage. Living minute to minute, the duo's love becomes a powerful tool in their war against the system. Written by Twentieth Century Fox

Plot Summary | Plot Synopsis

Taglines:

Time Is Power See more »


Motion Picture Rating (MPAA)

Rated PG-13 for violence, some sexualty and partial nudity, and strong language | See all certifications »

Parents Guide:

 »
Edit

Details

Country:

Language:

Release Date:

28 October 2011 (USA)  »

Also Known As:

I'm.mortal  »

Box Office

Budget:

$40,000,000 (estimated)

Opening Weekend:

PHP 9,547,497 (Philippines) (30 October 2011)

Gross:

$37,520,095 (USA)
 »

Company Credits

Show detailed on  »

Technical Specs

Runtime:

Color:

Aspect Ratio:

2.35 : 1
See  »
Edit

Did You Know?

Trivia

Sci-fi writer Harlan Ellison launched a lawsuit against New Regency and director Andrew Niccol, claiming that the film's plot bore an uncanny similarity to his short story "Repent Harlequin! Said the Ticktockman". Initially, Ellison was seeking an injunction against the film's release, which he then watered down to a request for onscreen credit. Ultimately the case was dropped with no money exchanging hands between any of the parties. See more »

Goofs

In the poker scene Will is seen to pick up a glass of champagne with his right hand. Less than 2 seconds later he is shown to be playing with his chips with his right hand. See more »

Quotes

[first lines]
Will Salas: I don't have time. I don't have time to worry about how it happened. It is what it is. We're genetically engineered to stop aging at 25. The trouble is, we live only one more year, unless we can get more time. Time is now the currency. We earn it and spend it. The rich can live forever. And the rest of us? I just want to wake up with more time on my hand than hours in the day.
See more »

Connections

Featured in Ebert Presents: At the Movies: Episode #2.16 (2011) See more »

Soundtracks

Leaves Before Autumn
Written and Performed by Julianna Raye
Courtesy of BMG Chrysalis
See more »

Frequently Asked Questions

See more (Spoiler Alert!) »

User Reviews

 
Time is wasting and you may want your time back at the end of the film
30 October 2011 | by (United Kingdom) – See all my reviews

I'll start straight off the cuff. Niccol is one of my favourite writer/directors. In fact, one of my favourite films is Gattaca, which has been so under-rated over the years since its release. To me he's been a great Sci-Fi writer, so going into this I was hopeful of something of quality.

Alas, "In Time" is not for the true Sci-Fi thinker. It paints a world in which time is money. That isn't that new an idea, but Niccols does succeed in pushing the metaphor as a commodity. Those with time are rich, those without time are poor. It's a simplistic analogy. As with Niccol's other films, the cinematography is beautiful. The best actors in the film aren't the main characters, rather Cillian Murphy, Vincent Kartheiser and (surprisingly) Alex Pettyfer present more interesting characters. They all shine, especially Murphy. The film seems like one long car chase, when what you actually want to delve into are the complexities - the debates between the characters themselves over the issues of the world they live in. Not a single clever conversation happens between anyone. Murphy is a great actor and I would have been interested to see the debate about right and wrong become greyed through some thinking. Life is not black and white. The film ending is unrealistic and I wonder if this was the ending envisioned by Niccol or the ending the producers wanted to boost sales.

Sadly this film could have been a great deal more. It had a good topic. It had some great actors, yet it failed because the story lost the nuances and complexities to meet the lowest common denominator, rather than raising questions or making the viewer think critically. See it, but be prepared to be disappointed. It isn't subtle.


226 of 356 people found this review helpful.  Was this review helpful to you?

Contribute to This Page

Create a character page for:
?