KAUFEN PAYCHECK
IMDb >
Paycheck (2003)
Quicklinks
Top Bezüge
trailers and videosBesetzung und StabDies und dasOffizielle WebsitesDialogzitateÜbersicht
HauptübersichtDetailangabenBesetzung und StabBeteiligte Firmentv scheduleAuszeichnungen & Kritiken
NutzerkommentareKommentar/KritikUsenet Kritik(en)awardsIhre Bewertungparents guideEmpfehlungenDiskussionsforumInhaltsangaben & Dialogzitate
Inhaltsangabeplot synopsisStichworte zum InhaltAmazon.com VideoDialogzitateFun-Ecke
Dies und dasPannenSoundtrackUlkiges im AbspannAlternativfassungenBezüge zu anderen TitelnHäufig gestellte Fragen (FAQ)Weitere Angaben
Zu kaufen bei...EinspielergebnisseStarttermineDrehorteTechnische AngabenLaserdisk(s)DVD(s)LiteraturNewsDeskPromotionmaterial
Werbezeilentrailers and videosFilmplakateFotogalerieNicht-lokale Verknüpfungen
Spielorte und -zeitenOffizielle WebsitesVerschiedenes...Fotographiensound clipsvideo clipsPaycheck (2003)
| Fotos (Alle 70 | Diashow) | Videos (see all 2 videos ) |
Übersicht
Werbezeile:
Remember the future. mehrPlot:
What seemed like a breezy idea for an engineer to net him millions of dollars, leaves him on the run for his life and piecing together why he's being chased. full summary | full synopsis (warning! may contain spoilers)Filmpreise:
2 wins & 1 nomination mehrNutzerkommentare:
Minority Report meets The Bourne Identity meets... hack producers and plain bad writing mehrBesetzung
(Hauptdarsteller)| Ben Affleck | ... | Michael Jennings | |
| Aaron Eckhart | ... | James Rethrick | |
| Uma Thurman | ... | Dr. Rachel Porter | |
| Paul Giamatti | ... | Shorty | |
| Colm Feore | ... | John Wolfe | |
| Joe Morton | ... | Agent Dodge | |
| Michael C. Hall | ... | Agent Klein | |
| Peter Friedman | ... | Atty. Gen. Brown | |
| Kathryn Morris | ... | Rita Dunne | |
| Ivana Milicevic | ... | Maya-Rachel | |
| Christopher Kennedy | ... | Stevens | |
| Fulvio Cecere | ... | Agent Fuman | |
| John Cassini | ... | Agent Mitchell | |
| Callum Keith Rennie | ... | Jude, Guard | |
| Michelle Harrison | ... | Jane |
Weitere Details
MPAA:
Rated PG-13 for intense action violence and brief language.Parents Guide:
View content advisory for parentsLänge:
119 MinProduktionsland:
USASprache:
EnglischFarbe:
FarbeSeitenverhältnis:
2.35 : 1 mehrAltersfreigabe:
Iceland:14 | Switzerland:14 (canton of Zurich) | South Korea:15 | Malaysia:18SG | Argentina:13 | Australia:M | Brazil:14 | Canada:14 (Nova Scotia) | Finland:K-15 | Germany:12 | Hong Kong:IIA | Ireland:15 | Netherlands:12 | Norway:15 | Philippines:PG-13 | Singapore:PG | Spain:13 | Sweden:11 | Switzerland:12 (canton of Geneva) | Switzerland:12 (canton of Vaud) | Switzerland:12 (canton of the Grisons) | UK:12A (original rating) | UK:12 (video rating) (2004) | USA:PG-13MOVIEmeter: 
Fun-Ecke
Dies und das:
The sender address of the envelope is M. Jennings/Alcom Eng. Dept., Discovery Park, Orondo, WA 98830 - phone 206.555.0101 - and the destination Jane Anderson/Reddy Grant, 401 Burrard St., Seattle, WA 98817 - phone 206.555.0199. The shipping date is 5/20/07. mehrPannen:
Abfolgefehler: When Michael saves Rachel from falling (both were hanging on plastic curtains) they are actually centimeters above the ground as seen in the next shot. mehrDialogzitate:
[first lines]Holographic Woman: It's time to wake up... and get a life. We live in a 3-dimensional world. Until now, the world of computing has been a flat world, consisting of 2-dimensional imagery. Now, through the use of exclusive breakthrough technology, ARC has made it possible for you to get a life. A-Life, where we can work and play in a lifelike world of 3-dimensional reality. A-Life, the living monitor.
mehr
Bezüge zu anderen Titeln:
Verweis/Anspielung/Erwähnung in Remembering the Future: Paycheck & the Worlds of Philip K. Dick (2004) (TV) mehrSoundtrack:
Conversations mehrHäufig gestellte Fragen (FAQ)
This FAQ is empty. Add the first question.mehr
Diskussionsforen
Discuss this title with other users on IMDb Diskussionsforum für Paycheck (2003) mehrEmpfehlungen
Wenn Ihnen dieser Film gefallen hat, empfehlen wir:
Zeigen Sie mehr Empfehlungen
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
| Minority Report | Don | The World Is Not Enough | Chik yeung tin si | The Spider Returns |
|
IMDb Nutzer-Bewertung:
|
IMDb Nutzer-Bewertung:
|
IMDb Nutzer-Bewertung:
|
IMDb Nutzer-Bewertung:
|
IMDb Nutzer-Bewertung:
|
Weitere Links
| Besetzung und Stab | Beteiligte Firmen | Externe Kritiken |
| Nachrichtenartikel | IMDb Sci-Fi section | IMDb USA section |
| Add this title to MyMovies |


















First, let me debunk the myth that this is "an awful movie" as I keep reading because it has some interesting (albeit unoriginal) notions and it often executes them well. More importantly, it will generally keep you interested by navigating futuristic concepts in a fast-spinning pace that will unable you to yawn or look at your watch. Secondly, in spite of its technologically-ridden science fiction premise, Paycheck does not fall prey to the fatal "style over substance" crime because it at least tries, which is more than I can say for its peers (Equilibrium, The Island, etc).
So the effort is at least there and 1/3 into the film, you feel that things are really well-sewn together when the plot starts unfolding. Then it completely falls apart. This is understandable, because it's pretty off-the-wall: Michael Jennings is an expert engineer hired by high-profile corporations for a reverse engineering technique which usually takes about 3-4 weeks depending on the task then his memory is wiped clean and he receives a big paycheck. Well, this process tears on him and when the opportunity for a big-budget, 3-year-long job presents itself as "the last job", Michael takes it. He also meets a girl during this time called Rachel (an unusually rough-looking Uma Thurman). With a clean slate post the completion of the job, Michael discovers that he has declined the paycheck and left an envelope for himself filled with clues as to what happened in the past and what lies ahead in the future.
It may sound intriguing but because this was originally written as a SHORT story by Philip K. Dick, all the characters are completely unexplored, flat and downright uninteresting. It does not help that Ben Affleck botches through the story with his usual puzzled look that only ever seems to fit in Kevin Smith productions. Thurman also inhabits a truly badly-written role here, and the banter between her and Affleck is self-referential in the most cringeworthy way (they quote their sappy first meeting, etc). They also mostly resort to meaningful glances to convey their love. That's the central performances for you, and sadly the ONE character that could have saved the others from the mud is Michael's buddy Paul Giamatti. Unfortunately he fades quickly and is later only ever used as a comedic sidekick to make up for the lack of clever things to say.
If you do not mind half-hearted acting from the leads, and perhaps you are only interesting in seeing this because it's a John Woo movie, then you will also be disappointed because there is little of Woo's dynamic, adrenaline-pumping, Mexican stand-off laden, martial arts-spinning action in this story. I remember one motorcycle chase that took me back to M-I-2 and strangely also The Bourne Identity (in which Matt Damon is being chased while on the search for his identity post-amnesia) but it was lacking in oomph; there is also a brief Woo-like face-off on the subway tracks between Affleck and the key henchman but this is the most daring John Woo will allow himself to get the rest of the time he blindly follows the standard formula for modern sci-fi/action fare. In other words, Affleck looks at an item in the envelope, has a startling revelation, sets out knowing exactly what to do and when to do it, being effortlessly aided by conveniently appearing objects and doors then some henchman interrupts him.
I think this is one of those films that continuity spies could OD on, because the plot really is thinner than an Olsen twin. For example, how could Michael be such an expert genius engineer if he keeps on erasing any technical information post completion of a work task? He'd have to start from scratch every time. You just have to look past the stupid goofs, the flat characters, the mediocre acting and the safe action if you want to enjoy Paycheck (2003) but then... there is not much left.
5 out of 10