4.8/10
104,418
557 user 102 critic

Charlie's Angels: Full Throttle (2003)

PG-13 | | Action, Adventure, Comedy | 27 June 2003 (USA)
The Angels investigate a series of murders which occur after the theft of a witness protection profile database.

Director:

Writers:

(television series), (television series) | 4 more credits »
Reviews
Popularity
2,523 ( 475)

Watch Now

From $2.99 (SD) on Amazon Video

ON DISC
9 wins & 20 nominations. See more awards »

Videos

Photos

Edit

Cast

Cast overview, first billed only:
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
Max
...
...
...
...
...
Edit

Storyline

The Angels--Natalie, Dylan, and Alex are back again but this time they're preparing for a strike without even warning as they go undercover to retrieve two missing silver bands. These are no ordinary rings. They contain valuable encrypted information that reveal the new identities of every person in the Federal Witness Protection Program. When witnesses start turning up dead, only the Angels, using their expertise as masters of disguise, espionage and martial arts can stop the perpetrator, a mysterious "fallen" Angel. Aided by their trusty colleague, Jimmy Bosley, the Angels' adventure begins at a remote Mongolian outpost and ends only after Dylan is forced to face a dark secret from her past--a secret that puts the lives of her two best friends in danger. Written by Anthony Pereyra {hypersonic91@yahoo.com}

Plot Summary | Plot Synopsis

Taglines:

This summer the Angels are back.


Motion Picture Rating (MPAA)

Rated PG-13 for action violence, sensuality and language/innuendo | See all certifications »

Parents Guide:

 »
Edit

Details

Official Sites:

Country:

Language:

| |

Release Date:

27 June 2003 (USA)  »

Also Known As:

Charlie's Angels 2  »

Box Office

Budget:

$120,000,000 (estimated)

Opening Weekend:

$1,903,213 (Japan) (27 June 2003)

Gross:

$100,685,880 (USA) (12 September 2003)
 »

Company Credits

Show detailed on  »

Technical Specs

Runtime:

| (unrated)

Sound Mix:

| | (8 channels)

Color:

Aspect Ratio:

2.35 : 1
See  »
Edit

Did You Know?

Trivia

The address on the envelope that Pete opens at the beginning of the film gives Pete and Natalie's address as 2028 The Strand, Hermosa Beach, California, which is a valid address on the beach. See more »

Goofs

The bullet hole on Natalie's top disappears when the Angels get up off the ground. See more »

Quotes

Madison Lee: [thinking that she's about to kill Charlie's Angels] Enjoy heaven.
Natalie Cook: Go to hell.
Alex Munday: [the Angels kill Madison; she dies amid flames] She's so fired.
See more »

Crazy Credits

After the "Columbia Pictures" intro, the shot zooms in to the torch the woman is holding, starting the scene. See more »

Connections

Spin-off Charlie's Angels: Animated Adventures (2003) See more »

Soundtracks

Wild Thing
Written by Matt Dike, Marvin Young and Anthony Smith
Performed by Tone Loc
Courtesy of Delicious Vinyl
See more »

Frequently Asked Questions

See more (Spoiler Alert!) »

User Reviews

 
Dollar for dollar, the worst movie ever made.
11 July 2004 | by (Maple Shade, NJ) – See all my reviews

$120,000,000 down the drain.

It's an action movie that's not exciting, a parody that's not funny, and an adventure that's not adventurous. It is a mystery - a mystery that anyone would like it. It even lack sex appeal.

Maybe McG needs to work on TV with a much smaller budget and less famous actors. He clearly can't get anything from the "angels" who seem more interested in laughing than acting. This movie cements their reputations (and Demi Moore's also) as truly bad actors. I don't feel bad for any of them.

I don't know about Bernie Mac. Is he that bad, or does he just get horrible roles? The best actors in the first film were Bill Murray and Tom Green. In the second? John Cleese and Matt LeBlanc. This is not what you want.

There are several random cameos throughout, not unlike the random plot itself. Much of the movie is a string of T&A, music, pyrotechnics and CG action. It truly is one extremely long music video - like Thriller would look like if created by two monkeys and an ATM machine.

I thought the $92 million "original" was bad, but the sequel managed to be about $28 million worse. Maybe someday, someone will make a film about how McG got $200 million to make two movies after directing a couple of popular music videos.

It could be worse, though - "Charlie's Angels 3: One Last Job"


31 of 56 people found this review helpful.  Was this review helpful to you?

Contribute to This Page