89 out of 102 people found the following comment useful :- Entertaining, 3. Februar 2005
Author:
Daniel Kahn von Canada
This comment is to counter those who have issue with modern rock and
other time problems being in this movie. This movie was designed to
entertain. It was NOT a historical piece and nowhere does it claim to
be one. This is the story of a boy who aspires to be more than what
society set out for him. The movie uses odd references to history's
great figures and humor to bring its story across to the viewer. So I
say that, for those of you who cannot enjoy a piece of entertainment
due to its well placed use of anachronisms, I strongly suggest you stay
away from any of Shakespeare's works. (Not to say that this movie was
on level with Shakespeare...) The makers of "A Knight's Tale" set out
to entertain, and did so dutifully.
88 out of 102 people found the following comment useful :- Could've been an absolute bomb, but somehow magically works perfectly!, 30. April 2001
Author:
kergillian (kergillian@hotmail.com) von Montreal, Canada
this film is ridiculously unbelievable, thin on plot, shamefully
predictable, historically inaccurate in so many ways...yet it all works! The
combination of modern music to medieval setting should be awful, but no, it
works! The costumes are totally wrong for the period (on purpose I'd hazard
to guess - at one point Angelina Jolie lookalike Shannyn Sossamon is wearing
a hat & dress outfit that looks startlingly similar to a costume Julia
Roberts wore in Pretty Woman...) but it works! Heath Ledger is an Aussie
(what happened to the black hair he had in 10 Things I Hate About You! I
didn't recognize him!) and Alan Tudyk is a Texan, so their accents should
have tanked! But they didn't, just a few slippages a la Mel Gibson in
Braveheart or Jonny Lee Miller in Hackers...
This film is funny, fast-paced (certainly didn't *feel* over 2h...), well
constructed, hilariously tongue-in-cheek (From the We Will Rock You opening
scene to the Nike swooshes on the armor I couldn't stop laughing!) It
certainly has its problems (including some *horribly* cheezy lines - most on
purpose but that doesn't make them any less horrible! and an evil Hollywood
ending - including a Bravheart-like scream of defiance in the final joust
that made me cringe...) but those problems are overcome by sharp wit and
consistent amusement. The actors were obviously enjoying themselves, and the
action was beautifully blended in with the rest of the film. None of the
jousting scenes were too long (like, say, the race in Phantom Menace...) and
all were shot in such a way as to make them really exciting!
And I have to laud Paul Bettany who was an incredible and incredibly amusing
Geoffrey Chaucer...even though he looks eerily similar, IMO, to Thom
Yorke...)
Kudos to anyone who recognizes Laura Fraser (the blacksmith) from Man in the
Iron Mask...
Overall: A great watch. I went in expecting little and came out extremely
satisfied. Not the best film of its kind, but a head above most. And the
blending of contemporary style and music and characterization with the
medieval story/setting is really well done. It really shouldn't but it does
work! 7/10.
66 out of 79 people found the following comment useful :- A surprisingly, wonderful hit!, 15. Mai 2001
Author:
Sam4226
As soon as I saw the fans singing and clapping to "We Will Rock You" I
thought "this is not very realistic". Of course, that was when I had gone
in expecting a film like Braveheart or The Patriot, with real historical
lessons. A Knight's Tale was nothing like either of those. After you get
past the first one or two scenes, everything really grows on you. The
humor
is, yes, cheesy at times, (the Nike armor) but I still laughed. Chaucer
was
great, the villain was definitely evil, and the jousting/action scenes were
very well done. Put all that together with some other funny sidekicks and
a
little romance and you've got a pretty good flick. Definitely a must see
more than once, and a must buy video/DVD when it's out!
68 out of 86 people found the following comment useful :- The one truly satisfying film of 2001, 27. Dezember 2001
Author:
coolman_35m (coolman_35m@yahoo.com) von Hanover, PA, USA
In the year of the lackluster blockbuster (ie Pearl Harbor) and horribly
disappointing hype-fests (ie Planet of the Apes) Brian Helgeland's "A
Knight's Tale" shines bright. What makes the film so amazing is that the
story isn't particularly fresh, the lead characters aren't particularly
original, and the "special effects" aren't particularly special, yet
Helgeland delivers a romping action comedy that delivers on all fronts.
This is fusion-theater at it's best. The audience is believeably
transported to the 14th century despite myriad references to the modern
world. We're assaulted by the action and drama, yet cradled by the humor
and emotion. Most importantly, at no point in the film are we brought
back
to reality; the characters are that charming and believeable. Even the
villain has certain endearing qualities. Not enough that we don't still
want to see him kicked swiftly in the groin, but we aren't totally put off
by him, either. Think Travolta in Swordfish, or Pacino in Scarface. The
men we love to hate.
It's difficult to lay a finger on what most gives this film its weight.
I'm
tempted to say it's the cast, because it's a collection of relative
unknowns
who manage to take their characters and completely make them their own.
Bettany's Chaucer is wickedly impressive, Tudyk's Wat is a scream, Addy's
Roland is almost squeezable, and Sewell's Adhemar is completely vile. The
only "star" in the film is the little-known Heath Ledger, who brings a
time-worn character to the screen with some kind of fresh perspective that
has us cheering from the moment we're introduced to him. There are no
Travoltas or Pacinos, and amazingly enough this film is all the better for
it.
Throughout the screenplay Brian Helgeland, who not only directed but wrote
and produced, gives us humor, sentiment and adrenaline in just the right
measure. The lead characters really aren't new, but they are somehow
fresh.
And the supporting characters, while assembled according to formula,
aren't
formulaic in any way. Their emotion, approach and sensibilities are quite
unique. Even the most predictable minor character (Edward the Black
Prince)
is oddly touching and powerful, despite the fact we know exactly what
we're
going to get with him.
The music is vibrant, and its usage is terribly original. The
cinematography is at times lacking (the lighting is off quite badly at
points, as the "Stocks" outtake presented on the DVD will make clear), but
even my jaundiced and jaded eye honestly didn't notice until the third
viewing of the film. Honestly, I was too riveted to pick up on it. I was
IN the 14th century. What did I know from lighting?
Costuming is first-rate, the dialogue is precious, and though some of the
humor is forced, by the time we get to those parts we're already too
entranced by the rolicking good nature of the film to even
care.
In short, this is a low-budget, minimal star-power action adventure comedy
romance that borrows all the best elements of The Three Musketeers (BOTH
major versions), The Karate Kid (of which I am much reminded) and An
Officer
and a Gentleman. It is quite a feat. The highest mark of respect I can
give a film is to actually purchase it (it goes against my grain to own a
movie when there's a Blockbuster on every corner), but I had "A Knight's
Tale" in my collection the day it was released...and this after having
paid
to see it three times in the theater!
Yes, it's been a disappointing year for Hollywood. But "A Knight's Tale"
proves that all is not lost. Rent it, buy it or steal it, but SEE
it!
68 out of 93 people found the following comment useful :- If you want to watch a serious film, don't watch this!, 8. August 2004
Author:
Al von Liverpool, England
Totally unbelievable.
Chronologically, historically and geographically incorrect.
Full of innumerable inaccuracies and made up of a cast who talk as
though they are not from the same continent, let alone the same
country! What more can I say?
I tell you what I can say, I thoroughly enjoyed it!!! I laughed from
beginning to end and was enraptured by the sense of friendship that
these people displayed.
I only wish we could all be like them!
I loved it.
34 out of 38 people found the following comment useful :- More accurate than you might think, 15. August 2003
Author:
bhirschi42 von Lake City, Fla.
The first time I saw A Knight's Tale (on cable, missed it in theater), I
had
the same reaction as many of you - Queen? David Bowie? In a movie set in
the
middle ages?
But I stayed with it, and I'm glad I did. Once you get past the glaring
anachronisms (put in the film on purpose, of course), you find the movie
is
actually quite true to its period.
The presence of Chaucer in the film, combined with some of its details,
leads me to suspect that Brian Helgeland has read "Chaucer's Knight" by
fellow filmmaker Terry Jones (of Monty Python fame). The book
deconstructs
the knight in Chaucer's "The Knight's Tale" in a totally unique way -- he
is
seen NOT as the flower of medieval chivalry (as most scholars have
interpreted him), but as a mercenary out for nothing but money and blood.
The character in the film Chaucer would have written about, then, is not
Sir
William Thatcher (Heath Ledger), but Count Adhemar of Anjou (Rufus
Sewell).
The part of the film in which this connection "clicked" for me was the
scene
where Count Adhemar is called away to his command in a "Free Company" --
a
particular stain on the reputation of knighthood which Jones talks
extensively about in his book.
Jones' book made use of extensive research into medieval history, and
Helgeland's film obviously does, too.
Chaucer was a master of satire in his day. Helgeland's use of modern
conventions in a period film is a conceit of which - I believe - Chaucer
would definitely have approved.
I gave "A Knight's Tale" 9 out of 10 - it's not perfect, but I like it so
much, I try to watch it every time it comes on (it's been on HBO and
Cinemax
pretty regularly for the past several months). Check it
out!
28 out of 32 people found the following comment useful :- Jousting With A Modern Take, 15. Juli 2006
Author:
ccthemovieman-1 von Lockport, NY, United States
A story about jousting but this old knight's tale is anything but old
because it mixes in satire of today's modern sports-audience age with
some funny bits. Those include the overly dramatic public address
announcer (boy, that's even more so since this film came out), rock
music blaring out as the contestants do battle, etc.
The main characters are nicely varied with distinct personalities.
Shannon Sossamon, however, was not quite up to leading-lady status and
hasn't had a choice role like this since, either. I would have rather
seen her "assistant" in this film, or the blacksmith woman, be the
lead. Anyway, even though it's a bit long at 132 minutes, it's still
entertaining most of the way, with some of the funniest bits at the
beginning. However, it's just as much a romance (with Heath Ledger as
the male lead) than a comedy.
What also is good is the sound and visuals in here: all high-class. The
lance hitting an opponent made an interesting sound each time. The
surround sound in here was good, too.
As entertaining and slick-looking as this was, I didn't find myself
caring if I saw this twice, frankly, which I why I didn't rate it
higher than '7' stars. However, it's a film most people would like, and
I recommend seeing it.
29 out of 38 people found the following comment useful :- Absolutely unexpected pleasure. Light-hearted but satisfying on many levels, 10. Juli 2005
Author:
mstomaso von Vulcan
This wonderfully uplifting little film has a great big heart, good
humor, and a classic message about love and honor, and the rarity and
preciousness of those who practice both with style. I went to see this
with my spouse and a good friend of ours because THEY (the spouse and
the friend) wanted to see it. I am a non-fan of comedies, and had been
annoyed by the stream of trashy Connecticut Yankee in King Arthur's
Court films that had been coming out since the 1980s. My spouse had
also informed me that I would be seeing Jousting performed to Bachman
Turner Overdrive. My reaction was to reach for the nearest bottle of
hard liquor. I didn't need it.
I've now seen this film about six times, and though I can't say that I
see something new in it every time (it's just not that complicated), I
can say that I have enjoyed it each and every time. The characters,
though relatively uncomplicated, are very lovable and the casting is
quite excellent all around. Before Brokeback Mountain, William Thatcher
was Heath Ledger's most memorable role. He's a poor boy from London's
Cheapside who wants to change his stars and to become an honored
knight. Travelling from tournament to tournament with his fellow
indentured servants, his liege passes on, and William seizes the moment
- taking his armor and his horse to become Sir Ulrich Von Liechtenstein
of the Gelderland.
He is joined by the other now-free indentures, and eventually, by
Chaucer and a female Farrier played by the wonderful Laura Fraser.
Eventually, William falls in love with a princess and is challenged by
a rival for her affections with a lot more experience, money and
political clout. The love story, which could have easily become a
distracting annoyance, in fact, comes to dominate and drive the story
very nicely.
Special kudos to Ledger, Alan Tudyk, Rufus Sewell, Paul Bettany and
James Purefoy for their awesome performances. And extra special kudos
to Director Brian Helgeland for pulling off an impossible task - taking
a fairy tale, making us want to believe it, and yet retaining some
wonderful elements of silliness often missing in the fairy tale genre.
This would make a wonderful romantic living-room double feature with
The Princess Bride.
Recommendation: Definitely worth seeing.
20 out of 22 people found the following comment useful :- Makes Braveheart Look Historically Accurate, 15. November 2002
Author:
Iok von Hiding Behind The Sofa
I first saw "A Knight's Tale" by chance. A few of us had decided on an ad
hoc visit to the local cinema and selected "A Knight's Tale" simply
because
it sounded the least "teen" movie on the bill. We slapped down our cash
and
took our seats.
The movie began...
A crowd of peasants are assembled to watch the jousting. And they're
singing "We Will Rock You."
My initial response was "God, this is going to be bad."
But as the movie continued, it suddenly dawned on me - I wasn't hating the
movie at all! On an intellectual level, I should have been booing and
throwing stuff at the screen but there's something about the sheer verve
and
energy of "A Knight's Tale" that just drags you in on an emotional level.
A clever script with many modern references, a good cast of likeable
characters and a fantastic soundtrack (the reveal of "Golden Years" is
particularly good) all add up to make "A Knight's Tale" one of the most
entertaining mainstream movies I've seen in a long time.
Normally I hate "popcorn" movies - not because I consider them "low brow"
or
an insult to the intelligence, but because they're shallow, tired and lack
soul. Yet "A Knight's Tale" is different. No, it won't change your life
and it won't make you ponder your place in the universe. But it will
entertain you.
If you're looking for an "old fashioned" good vs. evil movie with a twist,
or your copy of "The Princess Bride" is wearing thin, check out "A
Knight's
Tale."
8/10
17 out of 26 people found the following comment useful :- Rags to riches, love conquers all, never say quit, go for your dreams...., 24. Juli 2002
Author:
helpless_dancer von Broken Bow, Oklahoma
Fun little tale of a dirt poor lad willing to go all out for his lady love,
his honor, and to prove he is as good as any other warrior. Plenty of laughs
from a zany character or two and a grand adventure with plenty of old world
jousting, pageantry, and costumes. Loved the way the producers wove hard
rock tunes and today's lingo into the show's fabric and made it seem,
usually anyway, as thought it fit that time span. Cool
flic.
Quicklinks
Top Bezüge
trailers and videosBesetzung und StabDies und dasOffizielle WebsitesDialogzitateÜbersicht
HauptübersichtDetailangabenBesetzung und StabBeteiligte Firmentv scheduleAuszeichnungen & Kritiken
NutzerkommentareKommentar/KritikUsenet Kritik(en)awardsIhre Bewertungparents guideEmpfehlungenDiskussionsforumInhaltsangaben & Dialogzitate
Inhaltsangabeplot synopsisStichworte zum InhaltAmazon.com VideoDialogzitateFun-Ecke
Dies und dasPannenSoundtrackUlkiges im AbspannAlternativfassungenBezüge zu anderen TitelnHäufig gestellte Fragen (FAQ)Weitere Angaben
Zu kaufen bei...EinspielergebnisseStarttermineDrehorteTechnische AngabenLaserdisk(s)DVD(s)LiteraturNachrichtenartikelPromotionmaterial
Werbezeilentrailers and videosFilmplakateFotogalerieNicht-lokale Verknüpfungen
Spielorte und -zeitenOffizielle WebsitesVerschiedenes...Fotographiensound clipsvideo clipsIMDb user comments for
A Knight's Tale (2001)
89 out of 102 people found the following comment useful :-

Entertaining, 3. Februar 2005
Author: Daniel Kahn von Canada
This comment is to counter those who have issue with modern rock and other time problems being in this movie. This movie was designed to entertain. It was NOT a historical piece and nowhere does it claim to be one. This is the story of a boy who aspires to be more than what society set out for him. The movie uses odd references to history's great figures and humor to bring its story across to the viewer. So I say that, for those of you who cannot enjoy a piece of entertainment due to its well placed use of anachronisms, I strongly suggest you stay away from any of Shakespeare's works. (Not to say that this movie was on level with Shakespeare...) The makers of "A Knight's Tale" set out to entertain, and did so dutifully.
88 out of 102 people found the following comment useful :-

Could've been an absolute bomb, but somehow magically works perfectly!, 30. April 2001
Author: kergillian (kergillian@hotmail.com) von Montreal, Canada
this film is ridiculously unbelievable, thin on plot, shamefully predictable, historically inaccurate in so many ways...yet it all works! The combination of modern music to medieval setting should be awful, but no, it works! The costumes are totally wrong for the period (on purpose I'd hazard to guess - at one point Angelina Jolie lookalike Shannyn Sossamon is wearing a hat & dress outfit that looks startlingly similar to a costume Julia Roberts wore in Pretty Woman...) but it works! Heath Ledger is an Aussie (what happened to the black hair he had in 10 Things I Hate About You! I didn't recognize him!) and Alan Tudyk is a Texan, so their accents should have tanked! But they didn't, just a few slippages a la Mel Gibson in Braveheart or Jonny Lee Miller in Hackers...
This film is funny, fast-paced (certainly didn't *feel* over 2h...), well constructed, hilariously tongue-in-cheek (From the We Will Rock You opening scene to the Nike swooshes on the armor I couldn't stop laughing!) It certainly has its problems (including some *horribly* cheezy lines - most on purpose but that doesn't make them any less horrible! and an evil Hollywood ending - including a Bravheart-like scream of defiance in the final joust that made me cringe...) but those problems are overcome by sharp wit and consistent amusement. The actors were obviously enjoying themselves, and the action was beautifully blended in with the rest of the film. None of the jousting scenes were too long (like, say, the race in Phantom Menace...) and all were shot in such a way as to make them really exciting!
And I have to laud Paul Bettany who was an incredible and incredibly amusing Geoffrey Chaucer...even though he looks eerily similar, IMO, to Thom Yorke...)
Kudos to anyone who recognizes Laura Fraser (the blacksmith) from Man in the Iron Mask...
Overall: A great watch. I went in expecting little and came out extremely satisfied. Not the best film of its kind, but a head above most. And the blending of contemporary style and music and characterization with the medieval story/setting is really well done. It really shouldn't but it does work! 7/10.
66 out of 79 people found the following comment useful :-

A surprisingly, wonderful hit!, 15. Mai 2001
Author: Sam4226
As soon as I saw the fans singing and clapping to "We Will Rock You" I thought "this is not very realistic". Of course, that was when I had gone in expecting a film like Braveheart or The Patriot, with real historical lessons. A Knight's Tale was nothing like either of those. After you get past the first one or two scenes, everything really grows on you. The humor is, yes, cheesy at times, (the Nike armor) but I still laughed. Chaucer was great, the villain was definitely evil, and the jousting/action scenes were very well done. Put all that together with some other funny sidekicks and a little romance and you've got a pretty good flick. Definitely a must see more than once, and a must buy video/DVD when it's out!
68 out of 86 people found the following comment useful :-
The one truly satisfying film of 2001, 27. Dezember 2001
Author: coolman_35m (coolman_35m@yahoo.com) von Hanover, PA, USA
In the year of the lackluster blockbuster (ie Pearl Harbor) and horribly disappointing hype-fests (ie Planet of the Apes) Brian Helgeland's "A Knight's Tale" shines bright. What makes the film so amazing is that the story isn't particularly fresh, the lead characters aren't particularly original, and the "special effects" aren't particularly special, yet Helgeland delivers a romping action comedy that delivers on all fronts. This is fusion-theater at it's best. The audience is believeably transported to the 14th century despite myriad references to the modern world. We're assaulted by the action and drama, yet cradled by the humor and emotion. Most importantly, at no point in the film are we brought back to reality; the characters are that charming and believeable. Even the villain has certain endearing qualities. Not enough that we don't still want to see him kicked swiftly in the groin, but we aren't totally put off by him, either. Think Travolta in Swordfish, or Pacino in Scarface. The men we love to hate.
It's difficult to lay a finger on what most gives this film its weight. I'm tempted to say it's the cast, because it's a collection of relative unknowns who manage to take their characters and completely make them their own. Bettany's Chaucer is wickedly impressive, Tudyk's Wat is a scream, Addy's Roland is almost squeezable, and Sewell's Adhemar is completely vile. The only "star" in the film is the little-known Heath Ledger, who brings a time-worn character to the screen with some kind of fresh perspective that has us cheering from the moment we're introduced to him. There are no Travoltas or Pacinos, and amazingly enough this film is all the better for it.
Throughout the screenplay Brian Helgeland, who not only directed but wrote and produced, gives us humor, sentiment and adrenaline in just the right measure. The lead characters really aren't new, but they are somehow fresh. And the supporting characters, while assembled according to formula, aren't formulaic in any way. Their emotion, approach and sensibilities are quite unique. Even the most predictable minor character (Edward the Black Prince) is oddly touching and powerful, despite the fact we know exactly what we're going to get with him.
The music is vibrant, and its usage is terribly original. The cinematography is at times lacking (the lighting is off quite badly at points, as the "Stocks" outtake presented on the DVD will make clear), but even my jaundiced and jaded eye honestly didn't notice until the third viewing of the film. Honestly, I was too riveted to pick up on it. I was IN the 14th century. What did I know from lighting?
Costuming is first-rate, the dialogue is precious, and though some of the humor is forced, by the time we get to those parts we're already too entranced by the rolicking good nature of the film to even care.
In short, this is a low-budget, minimal star-power action adventure comedy romance that borrows all the best elements of The Three Musketeers (BOTH major versions), The Karate Kid (of which I am much reminded) and An Officer and a Gentleman. It is quite a feat. The highest mark of respect I can give a film is to actually purchase it (it goes against my grain to own a movie when there's a Blockbuster on every corner), but I had "A Knight's Tale" in my collection the day it was released...and this after having paid to see it three times in the theater!
Yes, it's been a disappointing year for Hollywood. But "A Knight's Tale" proves that all is not lost. Rent it, buy it or steal it, but SEE it!
68 out of 93 people found the following comment useful :-
If you want to watch a serious film, don't watch this!, 8. August 2004
Author: Al von Liverpool, England
Totally unbelievable.
Chronologically, historically and geographically incorrect.
Full of innumerable inaccuracies and made up of a cast who talk as though they are not from the same continent, let alone the same country! What more can I say?
I tell you what I can say, I thoroughly enjoyed it!!! I laughed from beginning to end and was enraptured by the sense of friendship that these people displayed.
I only wish we could all be like them!
I loved it.
34 out of 38 people found the following comment useful :-

More accurate than you might think, 15. August 2003
Author: bhirschi42 von Lake City, Fla.
The first time I saw A Knight's Tale (on cable, missed it in theater), I had the same reaction as many of you - Queen? David Bowie? In a movie set in the middle ages?
But I stayed with it, and I'm glad I did. Once you get past the glaring anachronisms (put in the film on purpose, of course), you find the movie is actually quite true to its period.
The presence of Chaucer in the film, combined with some of its details, leads me to suspect that Brian Helgeland has read "Chaucer's Knight" by fellow filmmaker Terry Jones (of Monty Python fame). The book deconstructs the knight in Chaucer's "The Knight's Tale" in a totally unique way -- he is seen NOT as the flower of medieval chivalry (as most scholars have interpreted him), but as a mercenary out for nothing but money and blood. The character in the film Chaucer would have written about, then, is not Sir William Thatcher (Heath Ledger), but Count Adhemar of Anjou (Rufus Sewell).
The part of the film in which this connection "clicked" for me was the scene where Count Adhemar is called away to his command in a "Free Company" -- a particular stain on the reputation of knighthood which Jones talks extensively about in his book.
Jones' book made use of extensive research into medieval history, and Helgeland's film obviously does, too.
Chaucer was a master of satire in his day. Helgeland's use of modern conventions in a period film is a conceit of which - I believe - Chaucer would definitely have approved.
I gave "A Knight's Tale" 9 out of 10 - it's not perfect, but I like it so much, I try to watch it every time it comes on (it's been on HBO and Cinemax pretty regularly for the past several months). Check it out!
28 out of 32 people found the following comment useful :-

Jousting With A Modern Take, 15. Juli 2006
Author: ccthemovieman-1 von Lockport, NY, United States
A story about jousting but this old knight's tale is anything but old because it mixes in satire of today's modern sports-audience age with some funny bits. Those include the overly dramatic public address announcer (boy, that's even more so since this film came out), rock music blaring out as the contestants do battle, etc.
The main characters are nicely varied with distinct personalities. Shannon Sossamon, however, was not quite up to leading-lady status and hasn't had a choice role like this since, either. I would have rather seen her "assistant" in this film, or the blacksmith woman, be the lead. Anyway, even though it's a bit long at 132 minutes, it's still entertaining most of the way, with some of the funniest bits at the beginning. However, it's just as much a romance (with Heath Ledger as the male lead) than a comedy.
What also is good is the sound and visuals in here: all high-class. The lance hitting an opponent made an interesting sound each time. The surround sound in here was good, too.
As entertaining and slick-looking as this was, I didn't find myself caring if I saw this twice, frankly, which I why I didn't rate it higher than '7' stars. However, it's a film most people would like, and I recommend seeing it.
29 out of 38 people found the following comment useful :-

Absolutely unexpected pleasure. Light-hearted but satisfying on many levels, 10. Juli 2005
Author: mstomaso von Vulcan
This wonderfully uplifting little film has a great big heart, good humor, and a classic message about love and honor, and the rarity and preciousness of those who practice both with style. I went to see this with my spouse and a good friend of ours because THEY (the spouse and the friend) wanted to see it. I am a non-fan of comedies, and had been annoyed by the stream of trashy Connecticut Yankee in King Arthur's Court films that had been coming out since the 1980s. My spouse had also informed me that I would be seeing Jousting performed to Bachman Turner Overdrive. My reaction was to reach for the nearest bottle of hard liquor. I didn't need it.
I've now seen this film about six times, and though I can't say that I see something new in it every time (it's just not that complicated), I can say that I have enjoyed it each and every time. The characters, though relatively uncomplicated, are very lovable and the casting is quite excellent all around. Before Brokeback Mountain, William Thatcher was Heath Ledger's most memorable role. He's a poor boy from London's Cheapside who wants to change his stars and to become an honored knight. Travelling from tournament to tournament with his fellow indentured servants, his liege passes on, and William seizes the moment - taking his armor and his horse to become Sir Ulrich Von Liechtenstein of the Gelderland.
He is joined by the other now-free indentures, and eventually, by Chaucer and a female Farrier played by the wonderful Laura Fraser. Eventually, William falls in love with a princess and is challenged by a rival for her affections with a lot more experience, money and political clout. The love story, which could have easily become a distracting annoyance, in fact, comes to dominate and drive the story very nicely.
Special kudos to Ledger, Alan Tudyk, Rufus Sewell, Paul Bettany and James Purefoy for their awesome performances. And extra special kudos to Director Brian Helgeland for pulling off an impossible task - taking a fairy tale, making us want to believe it, and yet retaining some wonderful elements of silliness often missing in the fairy tale genre. This would make a wonderful romantic living-room double feature with The Princess Bride.
Recommendation: Definitely worth seeing.
20 out of 22 people found the following comment useful :-

Makes Braveheart Look Historically Accurate, 15. November 2002
Author: Iok von Hiding Behind The Sofa
I first saw "A Knight's Tale" by chance. A few of us had decided on an ad hoc visit to the local cinema and selected "A Knight's Tale" simply because it sounded the least "teen" movie on the bill. We slapped down our cash and took our seats.
The movie began...
A crowd of peasants are assembled to watch the jousting. And they're singing "We Will Rock You."
My initial response was "God, this is going to be bad."
But as the movie continued, it suddenly dawned on me - I wasn't hating the movie at all! On an intellectual level, I should have been booing and throwing stuff at the screen but there's something about the sheer verve and energy of "A Knight's Tale" that just drags you in on an emotional level.
A clever script with many modern references, a good cast of likeable characters and a fantastic soundtrack (the reveal of "Golden Years" is particularly good) all add up to make "A Knight's Tale" one of the most entertaining mainstream movies I've seen in a long time.
Normally I hate "popcorn" movies - not because I consider them "low brow" or an insult to the intelligence, but because they're shallow, tired and lack soul. Yet "A Knight's Tale" is different. No, it won't change your life and it won't make you ponder your place in the universe. But it will entertain you.
If you're looking for an "old fashioned" good vs. evil movie with a twist, or your copy of "The Princess Bride" is wearing thin, check out "A Knight's Tale."
8/10
17 out of 26 people found the following comment useful :-

Rags to riches, love conquers all, never say quit, go for your dreams...., 24. Juli 2002
Author: helpless_dancer von Broken Bow, Oklahoma
Fun little tale of a dirt poor lad willing to go all out for his lady love, his honor, and to prove he is as good as any other warrior. Plenty of laughs from a zany character or two and a grand adventure with plenty of old world jousting, pageantry, and costumes. Loved the way the producers wove hard rock tunes and today's lingo into the show's fabric and made it seem, usually anyway, as thought it fit that time span. Cool flic.
Add another comment
Weitere Links