34 out of 34 people found the following comment useful :- Thackeray would have been proud, 20. Dezember 2000
Author:
PrimusM von Cambridge, England
Rarely has a classic work of literature been adapted for television so
well.
This is a marvellous retelling of William Thackeray's 19th century novel,
successful in almost every possible way. Purists may quibble that any
attempt to adapt this sprawling bane of literature students' lives will
always be doomed to failure simply because of the sheer size of it. But
what
makes this so good, particularly for those familiar with the novel, are two
things: its total commitment to the spirit of 'Vanity Fair', and joyously
perfect casting and acting.
As readers of VF will know, the narrator plays a very important part in the
book. His sly comments on the 'puppets' (as he often refers to the
characters) that perform in his 'play' are frequently funny, exciting and
always engaging. If VF is indeed 'a novel without a hero', it is no less
engrossing for it. For the story is literally a Fair: characters come and
go
as the narrator sees fit while we the audience look on with amusement. We
start with both Becky Sharp (the main character but not the traditional
heroine as Thackeray's contemporary audience would have expected) and
Amelia
Sedley, and we follow their fortunes and interaction with other characters
over some twenty or thirty years. Characters come, characters go; some die,
some are born. But nearly always the narrator is there to invite us to feel
something towards them: sympathy, repulsion, anger, love. And though he is
notable by his absence in the book's most powerful scenes, he will return shortly to talk about something
else that another character is getting up to. This is where this adaptation
nails the spirit of VF so precisely; it never forgets that these characters
are puppets in a play, performing for our entertainment. Traditional
bandstand music plays over scenes to reinforce this impression. The comedy
elements make us laugh (Jos Sedley and his enormous, well-fed behind trying
to mount a horse or carriage), the battle scenes are visceral, the dramatic
scenes are engrossing. And the sly comments of the narrator are subtly
retained in bizarre camera shots: the fat pig snuffling outside Queen's
Crawley, or the beggar playing 'Rule Britannia' with his little bells as
the soldiers march off to fight the Battle of Waterloo.
But this would have been for nought if the casting had not been spot on.
Natasha Little IS Becky Sharp. Beautiful, alluring, charming, witty,
cunning, deceptive and manipulative, she is every man's dream on the
outside
(I fell in love with her, and I can see all she is getting up to!). One
look
from her eyes is all that is required to get her climbing the social
ladder,
which ultimately is all that she wants. Frances Grey is also perfect as
Amelia; not as beautiful as Becky, but still pleasant, sweet and
kind-hearted, and forever doting on George Osborne. Tom Ward as Osborne was
not what I was expecting, yet he got it right: a dashing English officer,
strikingly handsome, and not totally devoid of morals, but very easily
succumbs to his vanity and pride. Philip Glenister as the only genuinely
heroic character in the book (though still not without faults), Dobbin,
again is not how I pictured the character, but again nails it perfectly:
slightly clumsy, socially awkward, but clear thinking, level-headed and
always ready to do the right thing. The rest of the cast play their
respective grotesques with equal perfection and relish - to single out each
and every one is impossible, though all deserve it.
As a lover of this book, I congratulate all on a job well done. I cannot
comment on how someone who has not read VF will like this series, but I can
understand that they may be a little bewildered by it all: the occasional
dizzy camerawork and loud brass band music. So long as you understand that
we are the audience of a colourful, vibrant fair populated by a rich
assortment of people, all with faults, all with redeeming features (however
materialistic they might be), then I think you should derive great pleasure
from it, because more than anything, this is great fun.
16 out of 16 people found the following comment useful :- Far superior to the Witherspoon vanity project, 29. April 2005
Author:
devil_doll12 von Canada
Generally I think that the great Victorian door-stoppers are better
suited to the mini series format than that of feature films because
even with a running time pushed to three hours there just isn't the
room for the typical panorama of characters, supporting characters,
plots and subplots. Even this production unavoidably leaves much out,
but it captures the essence of Thackeray--cold eyed cynicism very
occasionally softened by generosity. Nearly every element worked, right
down to the snorting pig that appeared at the beginning of each new
installment. I admit at first I was a bit disappointed by the choice of
Natasha Little to play Rebecca because I thought the actress was too
tall and elegant to play a character who was described as petite and
vivacious. But no matter; Little's cool headedness, verbal wit, and
carefully disguised ruthlessness were all pure Becky (unlike Mira Nair,
the screenwriters of this production realized that to soften this
character's harder edges wouldn't modernize her; rather, it would
flatten her). Frances Grey does fine in in the thankless role of Amelia
Sedley. Although this was somewhat out of keeping with the novel, I did
like the scene of Amelia still in bed after her wedding night, her hair
spread out on the pillow, blissfully talking to her new husband. It
makes her seem a bit more than stupidly devoted child-woman she is for
most of the novel and makes those later scenes in which Becky and
George (just weeks after George's marriage) brazenly flirt in front of
Amelia all the more painful. The other characters are well cast too,
with the terrifying Lord Steyne being the most memorable of all--in his
final scene, without having to say a word he looks as if he really will
have Becky murdered without a second thought if she ever approaches him
again.
All in all, highly recommended.
11 out of 12 people found the following comment useful :- Wonderful movie, and very faithful to the book!, 9. Januar 2001
Author:
hohoholden von Dresden, Germany
I saw this version of "Vanity Fair" when A&E premiered it in 1998, and I
was
totally captivated. I had not, at that time, read the book, so I was
happily tugged along by every twist and turn of this delightful tale. The
acting is outstanding on all accounts, the writing is solid, and
Thackeray's
story is timeless.
Now I am finally getting 'round to reading the book, and I am amazed by
how
faithful this mini-series is to the original work. Though I usually am
frustrated by the liberties that are taken with great literature, and I
believe that one should always "read the book" before taking in someone
else's interpretation of it, this is a case where having "seen the movie"
makes it even more fun to read the book.
Becky Sharp, Emmy Sedley, and especially Captain Dobbins (Philip Glenister
really shines) are vividly portrayed -- as are all of the characters.
This
is a real page-turner of a story, and A&E has done it justice. In either
order, read the book and watch the movie. You'll have great
fun!
16 out of 25 people found the following comment useful :- Brilliant portrayal of a psychopath, 12. April 2002
Author:
Stephen Hitchings von Sydney, Australia
There has been a ridiculous number of movies about psychopathic killers -
Silence of the Lambs, Se7en, Copycat, The Cell, etc, etc - and yet for a
realistic depiction of a psychopath, this mini-series leaves them all far
behind. If you want to see what the average psychopath is like (or perhaps
I
should say above average, because there is nothing average about Becky
Sharp), this is far more true to life than all the others. The reality is
that for every Hannibal Lecter in the world, there are a thousand Becky
Sharps, and together they do far more damage than all the serial killers.
I
can only think that Thackeray must have known someone like her, because
you
can't get this close to reality by sheer imagination, and I don't know of
any literary examples he could have copied from.
Of course, the novel, and the series, are about far more than one
character
- they are in fact about Vanity Fair, the world that Thackerary knew and
didn't particularly love, the society which was so warped and hypocritical
(rather like ours today, in fact) that it allowed characters like Becky
Sharp to prosper.
This is not nearly as pleasant as the usual BBC mini-series, but it is
compulsively watchable; the depiction is almost flawless and Natasha
Little
does a brilliant job portraying the woman we love to hate. The rest of the
cast is also excellent, including Nathaniel Parker as Rawdon, the
principal
victim of his wife's intrigues, Philip Glenister as the lovable but
awfully
clumsy Dobbin and David Bradley as the appalling baronet Sir Pitt
Crawley.
5 out of 5 people found the following comment useful :- Almost perfect ! Delightful., 5. Februar 2007
Author:
Kara Dahl Russell von United States
This is brisk, fun production that doesn't take itself any more
seriously than it should, and doesn't mind winking at us with a secret
smile at the same time. The story of Becky Sharp, a girl who is never
any better than she needs to be, and her friend Amelia who is much too
good for her own good.
Natasha Little is simply perfect as Becky. Little is the kind of woman
that women find hard to like: delicately beautiful, exceptionally
talented making her perfect to play Becky. It is the subtle nuances
in her moments that give her performance great depth and complexity
needed for accessibility for a selfish character who is the smartest
person in any room she is in. Becky is a woman who would agree with the
quote of another brilliant beauty, Hedy Lamar: "Any woman can be
glamorous. All she has to do is stand still and look stupid." Little's
Beky is not as likable or vulnerable as Reese Witherspoon who played
Becky in a major motion picture film version made right around the same
time but with a miniseries we have time to understand her more.
Besides, not many actresses are as likable as Witherspoon.
As the story begins, this production does not look lavish, but the
casting is so wonderful, the script so strong, the costumes simple but
just right, that we are given the ability to focus on getting to know
the people we will be following through 6 episodes.
It is this initial simplicity that is the brilliance of the production
design by Malcolm Thornton. In the early stages, poverty is cramped and
messy; work is dark, cluttered and rotting, and wealth is clean, and
bright and airy like freedom. As we progress through the story, wealth
becomes more complex, overstuffed and overdecorated, echoing the
complexity of the lives of Becky and Rawdon. Rawdon played by the
handsome and overwhelmingly talented Nathaniel Parker (INSPECTOR
LINLEY, BLEAK HOUSE).
Breathtaking Andrew Davies, possibly the most brilliant adapter of the
classics of all time, gifts us with a screenplay of grace and subtlety,
weaving the ease of modern speech perfectly into the period action in a
way that feels classic, but is totally accessible.
It all bounces along to the ohm-pa-pa of a brass band. This band is one
of the anachronistic touches of the production. While it passes as a
military band, it also has a the raw, slightly under-rehearsed sound of
a New Orleans jazz band, and sometimes a 1940s dance hall meanwhile
Becky's musical choices are straight from the pub to the delight of
the men around her. The band is really the only downfall of the
production, in the moments of great serious importance, the band hits
us over the head with a blaringly repetitive theme that gets very
annoying after 6 episodes. It is the only "wrong note" in an otherwise
witty and wise score. One of the nice subtle touches is that even
Becky's singing, which at first seems flawless and delightful, begins
to sound a bit flat in the episodes where we see dark results of her
behavior on those around her.
The music for Amelia and William is completely different. Plaintive
melodies played as quietly as loyalty and love that things only of the
good of the beloved. Philip Glenister as William carries the heart of
the piece with affecting restraint. Miriam Margoles does her best work
EVER here, and Jeremy Swift as Jos is absolutely delightful in every
moment he is on screen!
This entire miniseries is just marvelous, aspects of the production in
tune with each other, in service to the whole piece. FANTASTIC.
6 out of 10 people found the following comment useful :- No one does Victorian like the Brits, 3. Januar 2005
Author:
George Parker von Orange County, CA USA
A six hour miniseries by the BBC and A&E, "Vanity Fair" (1998) has
sufficient time to present the classic tale of the socially adroit,
cunning, and beguiling Becky Sharp's rise from lowly governess to lofty
aristocrat with depth, detail, and attention to the many characters and
side stories swirling around her. Given it's British pedigree, the film
recreates the period with fidelity from beautiful country vistas to
dank squalor; from stately manors to Gothic mansions; from handsome
gentlemen to grotesque lechers; from elegant gowns to threadbare
cloaks; etc. Natasha Little makes a superb centerpiece though her
fellow actors are equally well cast and competent in their roles. The
downside to the series is a somewhat uneven screenplay which spends
time while women sing parlor songs only to rush through some of the
moments in which we would most like to linger. The musical score is
annoyingly heavy handed, poorly nuanced, and often too much like a poor
Salvation Army brass street ensemble. "Vanity Fair" (1998) should be
time well spent for anyone into Victorian period fare, especially
comedy/dramas, the works of W.M. Thackeray, or fans of the players.
Subtitling is excellent. (B+)
2 out of 3 people found the following comment useful :- This is worth buying, 13. Oktober 2006
Author:
Vishal Agrawal von United States
*** This comment may contain spoilers ***
As the name suggests Vanity fair is about pretensions and showing off
vanity. The backdrop is London and the age is early 19th century.
William Makepeace Thackray has written an unbelievable piece of
literature and this film does justice to the great story of human
imperfections. Story in my opinion is a complete opposite of 'Dr Jekyl
and Mr Hyde'. Dr Jekyl and Mr Hyde suggests that there is no pure good
but there is pure evil while this story says that there is no pure good
or pure evil. Whatever the truth is the film brings out the flavor of
the time and intention of the film clearly on screen.
I watched all six episodes of 50 minutes each in a single day. I was
really mesmerized by the story and the direction. Actors are very good,
characterization is very deep and every episode has a surprise element
to it. Story doesn't finish until the last scene is over. I think it is
just right neither overdone nor underplayed. There are certain flaws
like actors don't age even after 10-12 years but the story is so good
that you see them as grown up men and women psychologically.
I think all the actors were fine. Story was really supported by very
good actors. Natasha Little was a delight to watch as a lady with grey
shades. I haven't read the novel or knew anything about it. I had to
chose between Mira Nair's 'Vanity Fair' and this one. It was easy I
have left Mira Nair's 3 films in the middle including 'Kama Sutra'.
Imagine how boring things can get. The film is really good but novel
has to be a masterpiece.
3 out of 6 people found the following comment useful :- A movie without a Hero, 6. November 1999
Author:
ehg von Pennsylvania
I enjoyed Vanity Fair. However, it probably won't be on my top ten list of
mini-series to watch. I love Andrew Davies work, but the character of
Becky
Sharp was dialogued rather sparsely. How many times can Ms. Sharp "look
sultry and seductive" instead of speaking? The stand-outs in the cast are
the man who played William Dobbins (Phillip Glenister) and Joss Sedley
(Jeremy Swift).
3 out of 7 people found the following comment useful :- Brilliant lead role, 5. September 2004
Author:
nwakego von Vietnam
I haven't seen the new version (it's not out in the theaters yet here),
but the fuss led me to re-watch the DVD of the mini-series. I agree
with the comments that this is not the top-of-the-drawer BBC
miniseries, although there are some very dramatic scenes, particularly
as the venue of the film shifts to Brussels in the lead-up to Waterloo.
Natasha Little is indeed bewitching as Becky Sharp, a slippery
character if ever there was one, and it will be interesting to see how
Reese Witherspoon will cope with this role. Perhaps since Ms. Little is
much less well-known than Ms. Witherspoon, she has more scope for
creating a unique image of the ambitious Becky Sharp. I look forward to
the comparison.
2 out of 10 people found the following comment useful :- My favourite novel, but not my favourite mini-series, 17. März 2004
Author:
TMMVDS von Finland
I have usually enjoyed tremendously British mini-series based on classic
novels, but...
I read that wonderful novel some 15 years ago when I was still teenager
and
I fell in love with it instantly. There can't be many novels as witty,
hilarious or ironic than this. Thackeray has a genius in understanding
humanity all in its various forms. He is a objective spectator who sees
all
what's happening around him, and understands human nature incredibly well.
He don't judge or praise anyone or anything. 'That's life' he shows us,
and
let the readers do their own convictions.
But then I saw this tv-series, and if I hadn't read the book first, maybe
I
wouldn't have bothered to do so after it either. You can't spoil a novel
that good completely, but still that tv-series left much to hope for. Like
in other mini-series, Tom Jones, made at the same time, there should have
been a commentator in it (novelist's alter ego). One of Vanity Fair's
strong
points are those wonderful comments which Thackeray made throughout the
book. Without them half the fun is missing.
I should also complain about annoyingly boisterous music, lack of colour
and
the casting, which wasn't that impressive in my opinion.
Well, of course I had great expectations, but if you haven't read the
original novel, or think it's something unique, this adaption might not be
that bad. After all, it's made by Brits and they rarely give us anything
totally rubbish.
Quicklinks
Top Bezüge
trailers and videosBesetzung und StabDies und dasOffizielle WebsitesDialogzitateÜbersicht
HauptübersichtDetailangabenBesetzung und StabBeteiligte FirmenEinzelne FolgenBesetzung der FolgenBewertungen der Folgen... nach Nutzer-Bewertung... nach Anzahl Nutzer-Bewertungentv scheduleAuszeichnungen & Kritiken
NutzerkommentareKommentar/KritikUsenet Kritik(en)awardsIhre BewertungEmpfehlungenDiskussionsforumInhaltsangaben & Dialogzitate
InhaltsangabeStichworte zum InhaltAmazon.com VideoDialogzitateFun-Ecke
Dies und dasPannenSoundtrackUlkiges im AbspannAlternativfassungenBezüge zu anderen TitelnHäufig gestellte Fragen (FAQ)Weitere Angaben
Zu kaufen bei...EinspielergebnisseStarttermineDrehorteTechnische AngabenLaserdisk(s)DVD(s)LiteraturNachrichtenartikelPromotionmaterial
Werbezeilentrailers and videosFilmplakateFotogalerieNicht-lokale Verknüpfungen
Spielorte und -zeitenOffizielle WebsitesVerschiedenes...Fotographiensound clipsvideo clipsIMDb user comments for
"Vanity Fair" (1998) (mini)
34 out of 34 people found the following comment useful :-

Thackeray would have been proud, 20. Dezember 2000
Author: PrimusM von Cambridge, England
Rarely has a classic work of literature been adapted for television so well. This is a marvellous retelling of William Thackeray's 19th century novel, successful in almost every possible way. Purists may quibble that any attempt to adapt this sprawling bane of literature students' lives will always be doomed to failure simply because of the sheer size of it. But what makes this so good, particularly for those familiar with the novel, are two things: its total commitment to the spirit of 'Vanity Fair', and joyously perfect casting and acting.
As readers of VF will know, the narrator plays a very important part in the book. His sly comments on the 'puppets' (as he often refers to the characters) that perform in his 'play' are frequently funny, exciting and always engaging. If VF is indeed 'a novel without a hero', it is no less engrossing for it. For the story is literally a Fair: characters come and go as the narrator sees fit while we the audience look on with amusement. We start with both Becky Sharp (the main character but not the traditional heroine as Thackeray's contemporary audience would have expected) and Amelia Sedley, and we follow their fortunes and interaction with other characters over some twenty or thirty years. Characters come, characters go; some die, some are born. But nearly always the narrator is there to invite us to feel something towards them: sympathy, repulsion, anger, love. And though he is notable by his absence in the book's most powerful scenes, he will return shortly to talk about something else that another character is getting up to. This is where this adaptation nails the spirit of VF so precisely; it never forgets that these characters are puppets in a play, performing for our entertainment. Traditional bandstand music plays over scenes to reinforce this impression. The comedy elements make us laugh (Jos Sedley and his enormous, well-fed behind trying to mount a horse or carriage), the battle scenes are visceral, the dramatic scenes are engrossing. And the sly comments of the narrator are subtly retained in bizarre camera shots: the fat pig snuffling outside Queen's Crawley, or the beggar playing 'Rule Britannia' with his little bells as the soldiers march off to fight the Battle of Waterloo.
But this would have been for nought if the casting had not been spot on. Natasha Little IS Becky Sharp. Beautiful, alluring, charming, witty, cunning, deceptive and manipulative, she is every man's dream on the outside (I fell in love with her, and I can see all she is getting up to!). One look from her eyes is all that is required to get her climbing the social ladder, which ultimately is all that she wants. Frances Grey is also perfect as Amelia; not as beautiful as Becky, but still pleasant, sweet and kind-hearted, and forever doting on George Osborne. Tom Ward as Osborne was not what I was expecting, yet he got it right: a dashing English officer, strikingly handsome, and not totally devoid of morals, but very easily succumbs to his vanity and pride. Philip Glenister as the only genuinely heroic character in the book (though still not without faults), Dobbin, again is not how I pictured the character, but again nails it perfectly: slightly clumsy, socially awkward, but clear thinking, level-headed and always ready to do the right thing. The rest of the cast play their respective grotesques with equal perfection and relish - to single out each and every one is impossible, though all deserve it.
As a lover of this book, I congratulate all on a job well done. I cannot comment on how someone who has not read VF will like this series, but I can understand that they may be a little bewildered by it all: the occasional dizzy camerawork and loud brass band music. So long as you understand that we are the audience of a colourful, vibrant fair populated by a rich assortment of people, all with faults, all with redeeming features (however materialistic they might be), then I think you should derive great pleasure from it, because more than anything, this is great fun.
16 out of 16 people found the following comment useful :-

Far superior to the Witherspoon vanity project, 29. April 2005
Author: devil_doll12 von Canada
Generally I think that the great Victorian door-stoppers are better suited to the mini series format than that of feature films because even with a running time pushed to three hours there just isn't the room for the typical panorama of characters, supporting characters, plots and subplots. Even this production unavoidably leaves much out, but it captures the essence of Thackeray--cold eyed cynicism very occasionally softened by generosity. Nearly every element worked, right down to the snorting pig that appeared at the beginning of each new installment. I admit at first I was a bit disappointed by the choice of Natasha Little to play Rebecca because I thought the actress was too tall and elegant to play a character who was described as petite and vivacious. But no matter; Little's cool headedness, verbal wit, and carefully disguised ruthlessness were all pure Becky (unlike Mira Nair, the screenwriters of this production realized that to soften this character's harder edges wouldn't modernize her; rather, it would flatten her). Frances Grey does fine in in the thankless role of Amelia Sedley. Although this was somewhat out of keeping with the novel, I did like the scene of Amelia still in bed after her wedding night, her hair spread out on the pillow, blissfully talking to her new husband. It makes her seem a bit more than stupidly devoted child-woman she is for most of the novel and makes those later scenes in which Becky and George (just weeks after George's marriage) brazenly flirt in front of Amelia all the more painful. The other characters are well cast too, with the terrifying Lord Steyne being the most memorable of all--in his final scene, without having to say a word he looks as if he really will have Becky murdered without a second thought if she ever approaches him again.
All in all, highly recommended.
11 out of 12 people found the following comment useful :-

Wonderful movie, and very faithful to the book!, 9. Januar 2001
Author: hohoholden von Dresden, Germany
I saw this version of "Vanity Fair" when A&E premiered it in 1998, and I was totally captivated. I had not, at that time, read the book, so I was happily tugged along by every twist and turn of this delightful tale. The acting is outstanding on all accounts, the writing is solid, and Thackeray's story is timeless.
Now I am finally getting 'round to reading the book, and I am amazed by how faithful this mini-series is to the original work. Though I usually am frustrated by the liberties that are taken with great literature, and I believe that one should always "read the book" before taking in someone else's interpretation of it, this is a case where having "seen the movie" makes it even more fun to read the book.
Becky Sharp, Emmy Sedley, and especially Captain Dobbins (Philip Glenister really shines) are vividly portrayed -- as are all of the characters. This is a real page-turner of a story, and A&E has done it justice. In either order, read the book and watch the movie. You'll have great fun!
16 out of 25 people found the following comment useful :-

Brilliant portrayal of a psychopath, 12. April 2002
Author: Stephen Hitchings von Sydney, Australia
There has been a ridiculous number of movies about psychopathic killers - Silence of the Lambs, Se7en, Copycat, The Cell, etc, etc - and yet for a realistic depiction of a psychopath, this mini-series leaves them all far behind. If you want to see what the average psychopath is like (or perhaps I should say above average, because there is nothing average about Becky Sharp), this is far more true to life than all the others. The reality is that for every Hannibal Lecter in the world, there are a thousand Becky Sharps, and together they do far more damage than all the serial killers. I can only think that Thackeray must have known someone like her, because you can't get this close to reality by sheer imagination, and I don't know of any literary examples he could have copied from.
Of course, the novel, and the series, are about far more than one character - they are in fact about Vanity Fair, the world that Thackerary knew and didn't particularly love, the society which was so warped and hypocritical (rather like ours today, in fact) that it allowed characters like Becky Sharp to prosper.
This is not nearly as pleasant as the usual BBC mini-series, but it is compulsively watchable; the depiction is almost flawless and Natasha Little does a brilliant job portraying the woman we love to hate. The rest of the cast is also excellent, including Nathaniel Parker as Rawdon, the principal victim of his wife's intrigues, Philip Glenister as the lovable but awfully clumsy Dobbin and David Bradley as the appalling baronet Sir Pitt Crawley.
5 out of 5 people found the following comment useful :-

Almost perfect ! Delightful., 5. Februar 2007
Author: Kara Dahl Russell von United States
This is brisk, fun production that doesn't take itself any more seriously than it should, and doesn't mind winking at us with a secret smile at the same time. The story of Becky Sharp, a girl who is never any better than she needs to be, and her friend Amelia who is much too good for her own good.
Natasha Little is simply perfect as Becky. Little is the kind of woman that women find hard to like: delicately beautiful, exceptionally talented making her perfect to play Becky. It is the subtle nuances in her moments that give her performance great depth and complexity needed for accessibility for a selfish character who is the smartest person in any room she is in. Becky is a woman who would agree with the quote of another brilliant beauty, Hedy Lamar: "Any woman can be glamorous. All she has to do is stand still and look stupid." Little's Beky is not as likable or vulnerable as Reese Witherspoon who played Becky in a major motion picture film version made right around the same time but with a miniseries we have time to understand her more. Besides, not many actresses are as likable as Witherspoon.
As the story begins, this production does not look lavish, but the casting is so wonderful, the script so strong, the costumes simple but just right, that we are given the ability to focus on getting to know the people we will be following through 6 episodes.
It is this initial simplicity that is the brilliance of the production design by Malcolm Thornton. In the early stages, poverty is cramped and messy; work is dark, cluttered and rotting, and wealth is clean, and bright and airy like freedom. As we progress through the story, wealth becomes more complex, overstuffed and overdecorated, echoing the complexity of the lives of Becky and Rawdon. Rawdon played by the handsome and overwhelmingly talented Nathaniel Parker (INSPECTOR LINLEY, BLEAK HOUSE).
Breathtaking Andrew Davies, possibly the most brilliant adapter of the classics of all time, gifts us with a screenplay of grace and subtlety, weaving the ease of modern speech perfectly into the period action in a way that feels classic, but is totally accessible.
It all bounces along to the ohm-pa-pa of a brass band. This band is one of the anachronistic touches of the production. While it passes as a military band, it also has a the raw, slightly under-rehearsed sound of a New Orleans jazz band, and sometimes a 1940s dance hall meanwhile Becky's musical choices are straight from the pub to the delight of the men around her. The band is really the only downfall of the production, in the moments of great serious importance, the band hits us over the head with a blaringly repetitive theme that gets very annoying after 6 episodes. It is the only "wrong note" in an otherwise witty and wise score. One of the nice subtle touches is that even Becky's singing, which at first seems flawless and delightful, begins to sound a bit flat in the episodes where we see dark results of her behavior on those around her.
The music for Amelia and William is completely different. Plaintive melodies played as quietly as loyalty and love that things only of the good of the beloved. Philip Glenister as William carries the heart of the piece with affecting restraint. Miriam Margoles does her best work EVER here, and Jeremy Swift as Jos is absolutely delightful in every moment he is on screen!
This entire miniseries is just marvelous, aspects of the production in tune with each other, in service to the whole piece. FANTASTIC.
6 out of 10 people found the following comment useful :-

No one does Victorian like the Brits, 3. Januar 2005
Author: George Parker von Orange County, CA USA
A six hour miniseries by the BBC and A&E, "Vanity Fair" (1998) has sufficient time to present the classic tale of the socially adroit, cunning, and beguiling Becky Sharp's rise from lowly governess to lofty aristocrat with depth, detail, and attention to the many characters and side stories swirling around her. Given it's British pedigree, the film recreates the period with fidelity from beautiful country vistas to dank squalor; from stately manors to Gothic mansions; from handsome gentlemen to grotesque lechers; from elegant gowns to threadbare cloaks; etc. Natasha Little makes a superb centerpiece though her fellow actors are equally well cast and competent in their roles. The downside to the series is a somewhat uneven screenplay which spends time while women sing parlor songs only to rush through some of the moments in which we would most like to linger. The musical score is annoyingly heavy handed, poorly nuanced, and often too much like a poor Salvation Army brass street ensemble. "Vanity Fair" (1998) should be time well spent for anyone into Victorian period fare, especially comedy/dramas, the works of W.M. Thackeray, or fans of the players. Subtitling is excellent. (B+)
2 out of 3 people found the following comment useful :-

This is worth buying, 13. Oktober 2006
Author: Vishal Agrawal von United States
*** This comment may contain spoilers ***
As the name suggests Vanity fair is about pretensions and showing off vanity. The backdrop is London and the age is early 19th century. William Makepeace Thackray has written an unbelievable piece of literature and this film does justice to the great story of human imperfections. Story in my opinion is a complete opposite of 'Dr Jekyl and Mr Hyde'. Dr Jekyl and Mr Hyde suggests that there is no pure good but there is pure evil while this story says that there is no pure good or pure evil. Whatever the truth is the film brings out the flavor of the time and intention of the film clearly on screen.
I watched all six episodes of 50 minutes each in a single day. I was really mesmerized by the story and the direction. Actors are very good, characterization is very deep and every episode has a surprise element to it. Story doesn't finish until the last scene is over. I think it is just right neither overdone nor underplayed. There are certain flaws like actors don't age even after 10-12 years but the story is so good that you see them as grown up men and women psychologically.
I think all the actors were fine. Story was really supported by very good actors. Natasha Little was a delight to watch as a lady with grey shades. I haven't read the novel or knew anything about it. I had to chose between Mira Nair's 'Vanity Fair' and this one. It was easy I have left Mira Nair's 3 films in the middle including 'Kama Sutra'. Imagine how boring things can get. The film is really good but novel has to be a masterpiece.
3 out of 6 people found the following comment useful :-
A movie without a Hero, 6. November 1999
Author: ehg von Pennsylvania
I enjoyed Vanity Fair. However, it probably won't be on my top ten list of mini-series to watch. I love Andrew Davies work, but the character of Becky Sharp was dialogued rather sparsely. How many times can Ms. Sharp "look sultry and seductive" instead of speaking? The stand-outs in the cast are the man who played William Dobbins (Phillip Glenister) and Joss Sedley (Jeremy Swift).
3 out of 7 people found the following comment useful :-
Brilliant lead role, 5. September 2004
Author: nwakego von Vietnam
I haven't seen the new version (it's not out in the theaters yet here), but the fuss led me to re-watch the DVD of the mini-series. I agree with the comments that this is not the top-of-the-drawer BBC miniseries, although there are some very dramatic scenes, particularly as the venue of the film shifts to Brussels in the lead-up to Waterloo. Natasha Little is indeed bewitching as Becky Sharp, a slippery character if ever there was one, and it will be interesting to see how Reese Witherspoon will cope with this role. Perhaps since Ms. Little is much less well-known than Ms. Witherspoon, she has more scope for creating a unique image of the ambitious Becky Sharp. I look forward to the comparison.
2 out of 10 people found the following comment useful :-

My favourite novel, but not my favourite mini-series, 17. März 2004
Author: TMMVDS von Finland
I have usually enjoyed tremendously British mini-series based on classic novels, but...
I read that wonderful novel some 15 years ago when I was still teenager and I fell in love with it instantly. There can't be many novels as witty, hilarious or ironic than this. Thackeray has a genius in understanding humanity all in its various forms. He is a objective spectator who sees all what's happening around him, and understands human nature incredibly well. He don't judge or praise anyone or anything. 'That's life' he shows us, and let the readers do their own convictions.
But then I saw this tv-series, and if I hadn't read the book first, maybe I wouldn't have bothered to do so after it either. You can't spoil a novel that good completely, but still that tv-series left much to hope for. Like in other mini-series, Tom Jones, made at the same time, there should have been a commentator in it (novelist's alter ego). One of Vanity Fair's strong points are those wonderful comments which Thackeray made throughout the book. Without them half the fun is missing.
I should also complain about annoyingly boisterous music, lack of colour and the casting, which wasn't that impressive in my opinion.
Well, of course I had great expectations, but if you haven't read the original novel, or think it's something unique, this adaption might not be that bad. After all, it's made by Brits and they rarely give us anything totally rubbish.
Add another comment
Weitere Links