KAUFEN CIVIL...
Amazon.com Amazon.ca Amazon.co.uk Amazon.de Amazon.fr
IMDb > A Civil Action (1998)
A Civil Action
[Add to My Movies]
Quicklinks
Top Bezüge
trailers and videosBesetzung und StabDies und dasOffizielle WebsitesDialogzitate
Übersicht
HauptübersichtDetailangabenBesetzung und StabBeteiligte Firmentv schedule
Auszeichnungen & Kritiken
NutzerkommentareKommentar/KritikUsenet Kritik(en)awardsIhre Bewertungparents guideEmpfehlungenDiskussionsforum
Inhaltsangaben & Dialogzitate
Inhaltsangabeplot synopsisStichworte zum InhaltAmazon.com VideoDialogzitate
Fun-Ecke
Dies und dasPannenSoundtrackUlkiges im AbspannAlternativfassungenBezüge zu anderen TitelnHäufig gestellte Fragen (FAQ)
Weitere Angaben
Zu kaufen bei...EinspielergebnisseStarttermineDrehorteTechnische AngabenLaserdisk(s)DVD(s)LiteraturNewsDesk
Promotionmaterial
Werbezeilentrailers and videosFilmplakateFotogalerie
Nicht-lokale Verknüpfungen
Spielorte und -zeitenOffizielle WebsitesVerschiedenes...Fotographiensound clipsvideo clips

A Civil Action (1998)

Werbung
Registrieren oder melden Sie sich an, um diesen Titel zu bewerten.
Nutzer-Bewertung: 6.3/10 (11,324 Bewertungen)
Fotos (Alle 33 | Diashow) Videos

Übersicht

Regisseur:
Steven Zaillian
Drehbuchautoren (WGA):
Jonathan Harr (book)
Steven Zaillian (screenplay)
Premierendatum:
8. Januar 1999 (USA) mehr Trailer ansehen
Genre:
Drama mehr
Werbezeile:
Justice has its price.
Plot:
The families of children who died sue two companies for dumping toxic waste: a tort so expensive to prove, the case could bankrupt their lawyer. full summary | add synopsis
Filmpreise:
Nominated for 2 Oscars. Another 5 wins & 8 nominations mehr
Nutzerkommentare:
There's no place for pride in the courtroom mehr

Besetzung

 (Hauptdarsteller)
Create a character page for: ?

Weitere Details

Alternativ:
Zivilprozeß (Österreich) (Deutschland) [de]
mehr
MPAA:
Rated PG-13 for some strong language.
Länge:
115 Min
Produktionsland:
USA
Sprache:
Englisch
Farbe:
Farbe
Seitenverhältnis:
1.85 : 1 mehr
Tonverfahren:
DTS | Dolby Digital | SDDS
Altersfreigabe:
USA:PG-13 (certificate #36309) | South Korea:12 | Iceland:L | Argentina:13 | Australia:M (original rating) | Australia:PG (TV rating) | Chile:14 | Finland:K-12 | France:U | Germany:12 (w) | Norway:7 | Peru:14 | Portugal:M/12 | Spain:T | Switzerland:7 (canton of Geneva) | Switzerland:7 (canton of Vaud) | UK:15 | Singapore:PG
MOVIEmeter: ?
^ 6% since last week why?

Fun-Ecke

Dies und das:
Steven Zaillian adapted the screenplay with nobody else but 'Robert Duvall (I)' in mind for the role of Jerome Facher. mehr
Pannen:
Abfolgefehler: Near the end of the movie, the envelope from the EPA appears on Facher's desk before the employee places it there. mehr
Dialogzitate:
James Gordon: [Regarding the case and the following settlement] Mrs. Anderson, you're looking at four guys who are broke. We lost everything trying this case.
Anne Anderson: How can you even begin to compare what you've lost, to what we've lost.
mehr
Bezüge zu anderen Titeln:
Ausschnittsweise enthalten in The 56th Annual Golden Globe Awards (1999) (TV) mehr
Soundtrack:
Theme mehr

Häufig gestellte Fragen (FAQ)

This FAQ is empty. Add the first question.
17 out of 18 people found the following comment useful:-
There's no place for pride in the courtroom, 22 May 1999
Author: Philby-3 von Sydney, Australia

Courtroom drama is a robust dramatic formula; there is human conflict, suspense and, in the verdict, resolution. In the real world court cases don't run to the formula; many cases are stillborn, many are settled before trial, some seemingly decisive victories are reversed on appeal. The lawyers generally seem to survive though. In the American system of civil litigation the contingent fee is common - the lawyer gets paid only if the client succeeds, usually a third of the verdict or settlement amount. This can lead to some pretty crass conduct.

In this film, based on a very fine book about real events in the Boston area, we have a rather rare example of a lawyer trying so hard he defeats his own cause. Yet at the end he may have brought about a greater social good. Jan Schlictman (played with smarmy aplomb by John Travolta) is a seasoned plaintiff's lawyer in personal injury cases who knows all the tricks, both in pre-trial negotiation and before a jury. He is persuaded by an associate to look into a claim by a small community that its water has been poisoned by industrial waste resulting in the deaths of at least eight children from leukemia and other ailments. The case captures his attention and before long the entire resources of his four-partner firm are concentrated on it. They are up against a local tannery owner and two huge corporations, Beatrice and W&R Grace. Beatrice is represented by Faucher (a stand-out performance from Robert Duvall) a crusty veteran of 45 years litigation (and Harvard Law School lecturer), and he doesn't have much trouble cutting Jan down to size.

Despite the escalating cost Jan doesn't seem to know when to stop. His partner James (another gem-like performance from William H Macy) does everything he can to raise money, including applying for credit cards from banks as far away as Fargo, North Dakota (those who saw Macy in "Fargo" will chuckle over that one.) Total disaster is averted but it seems that Jan has been fighting the wrong battle.

To fit the mood the lighting is dull (surely the Boston Courts are not quite as gloomy as portrayed) and the weather awful. I've never seen it rain so much in a movie. Against this dismal backdrop the performances are luminous. Apart from those already mentioned there is John Lithgow (of "Third Rock from the Sun" fame) as a conceited judge, Kathleen Quinlan as a bereaved parent, Bruce Norris as Cheeseman, Grace's super nerd lawyer, Dan Hedaya as O'Reilly the evil tannery owner and Stephen Fry as a very English geologist. And who should pop up at the end as a bankruptcy judge but Kathy Bates.

This is a case where I have read the book (by Jonathan Harr) and for the movie the film makers have rather sidelined the plaintiff/victims and focused more on Jan's manic prosecution of the case. This helps the drama but does give the impression that the plaintiffs were helpless bystanders. This was not so, as the book shows.

As a movie this one succeeds very well. Some have complained it's a bit slow and requires rather too much legal knowledge from ordinary filmgoers but there is plenty of tension and the ending is as satisfactory as one gets in real life. It's a movie to make a lawyer cringe, and that is probably recommendation enough.

Was the above comment useful to you?
mehr

Diskussionsforen

Discuss this title with other users on IMDb Diskussionsforum für A Civil Action (1998)
Recent Posts (updated daily)User
The final scene (***Spoiler alert***) puffin88
There is a goof that makes the film lose some credibility. birdman2
Jerome Facher boldlygo2
Best Law Student Movie to Watch blaviage-1
Anyone want to be a lawyer after this? JakeMovieMan
A CIVIL ACTION and ERIN BROCKOVICH wmjahn
mehr

Empfehlungen

Wenn Ihnen dieser Film gefallen hat, empfehlen wir:
- - - - -
Erin Brockovich Chicago Michael Clayton Anatomy of a Murder Batoru rowaiaru
IMDb Nutzer-Bewertung:
IMDb Nutzer-Bewertung:
IMDb Nutzer-Bewertung:
IMDb Nutzer-Bewertung:
IMDb Nutzer-Bewertung:
Zeigen Sie mehr Empfehlungen

Weitere Links

Besetzung und Stab Beteiligte Firmen Externe Kritiken
Nachrichtenartikel IMDb Drama section IMDb USA section
Add this title to MyMovies

Sie können das IMDb-Team auf Fehler und Lücken auf dieser Seite hinweisen. Ihre Angaben werden überprüft und sofern akzeptabel bei kommenden Datenbankaktualisierungen miteinbezogen. Wenn Sie auf den Button links klicken, starten Sie den neuen und verbesserten Schritt-für-Schritt Prozess zur Dateneingabe.