KAUFEN SENSE AND...
IMDb >
Sense and Sensibility (1981) (TV)
Quicklinks
Top Bezüge
trailers and videosBesetzung und StabDies und dasOffizielle WebsitesDialogzitateÜbersicht
HauptübersichtDetailangabenBesetzung und StabBeteiligte Firmentv scheduleAuszeichnungen & Kritiken
NutzerkommentareKommentar/KritikUsenet Kritik(en)awardsIhre Bewertungparents guideEmpfehlungenDiskussionsforumInhaltsangaben & Dialogzitate
Inhaltsangabeplot synopsisStichworte zum InhaltAmazon.com VideoDialogzitateFun-Ecke
Dies und dasPannenSoundtrackUlkiges im AbspannAlternativfassungenBezüge zu anderen TitelnHäufig gestellte Fragen (FAQ)Weitere Angaben
Zu kaufen bei...EinspielergebnisseStarttermineDrehorteTechnische AngabenLaserdisk(s)DVD(s)LiteraturNewsDeskPromotionmaterial
Werbezeilentrailers and videosFilmplakateFotogalerieNicht-lokale Verknüpfungen
Spielorte und -zeitenOffizielle WebsitesVerschiedenes...Fotographiensound clipsvideo clipsSense and Sensibility (1981) (TV)
| Fotos (Alle 9 | Diashow) |
Übersicht
Premierendatum:
1. Februar 1981 (UK) mehrPlot:
add synopsisNutzerkommentare:
Skip it. See the 1995 version. mehrBesetzung
(Hauptdarsteller)mehr
Weitere Details
Parents Guide:
Add content advisory for parentsLänge:
174 Min | UK:30 Min (7 episodes)Produktionsland:
UKSprache:
EnglischFarbe:
FarbeTonverfahren:
MonoMOVIEmeter: 
Fun-Ecke
Dialogzitate:
Elinor Dashwood: Do you have an understanding with Fanny's brother, Robert?Lucy Steele: That great coxcomb! No! Although I've never met him. No, with Edward.
mehr
Soundtrack:
Piano Sonatina in G Major: II. Rondo - Allegro mehrHäufig gestellte Fragen (FAQ)
This FAQ is empty. Add the first question.mehr
Diskussionsforen
Discuss this title with other users on IMDb Diskussionsforum für Sense and Sensibility (1981) (TV)Empfehlungen
Wenn Ihnen dieser Film gefallen hat, empfehlen wir:
Zeigen Sie mehr Empfehlungen
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
| Sense and Sensibility | Sense and Sensibility | Persuasion | Becoming Jane | Pride & Prejudice |
|
IMDb Nutzer-Bewertung:
|
IMDb Nutzer-Bewertung:
|
IMDb Nutzer-Bewertung:
|
IMDb Nutzer-Bewertung:
|
IMDb Nutzer-Bewertung:
|
Weitere Links
| Besetzung und Stab | Beteiligte Firmen | IMDb Drama section |
| IMDb UK section | Add this title to MyMovies |















Luckily we have the beautiful 1995 version to remind us that this is actually a wonderful story. You wouldn't know it from this. The actors are wooden, the costumes are lacking and the locations are dreary. The opening sequence with Elinor and Marianne sitting on some sort of demented cousin of a see-saw is just out and out creepy. None of the actors seem to have any interest and definitely no excitement with their roles. They're practically sleepwalking! The first problem with this is really in the script. The writers did not seem to find any of the humor in the book, and seemed to focus on all the wrong things. As has already been mentioned, the character of Margaret is completely left out. This isn't really a big deal, she is hardly in the book at all (kind of like Kitty in Pride & Prejudice - she's just there). But in her version, Emma Thompson really saw potential in the character of Margaret to add some cute one-liners and bring some comic relief. She expanded the character rather than deleting it, and it's easy to see which way worked better.
There's no comic relief in this version at all. No one's funny. No one's even interesting. This focuses too much on the Elinor/Edward factor and doesn't put any real energy in the Marianne/Willoughby/Brandon triangle - a real misfortune because I always found the latter plot line far more interesting.
Irene Richard does turn in an acceptable performance as Elinor. Tracey Childs is an okay Marianne, but definitely nothing exceptional. She loses major points when you compare her portrayal with Kate Winslet's Oscar-nominated one. Where Childs was quiet and accepting Winslet was all over the place with passion. To Childs's defense, let's note that she had the most wooden and irritating actors playing her suitors, while Winslet had the incredibly handsome Alan Rickman and Greg Wise.
All in all, this version just falls short in too many ways. See the remake, it's a shining example of how Austen *should* be done.