KAUFEN HOW THE...
IMDb >
How the West Was Won (1962)
Quicklinks
Top Bezüge
trailers and videosBesetzung und StabDies und dasOffizielle WebsitesDialogzitateÜbersicht
HauptübersichtDetailangabenBesetzung und StabBeteiligte Firmentv scheduleAuszeichnungen & Kritiken
NutzerkommentareKommentar/KritikUsenet Kritik(en)awardsIhre Bewertungparents guideEmpfehlungenDiskussionsforumInhaltsangaben & Dialogzitate
Inhaltsangabeplot synopsisStichworte zum InhaltAmazon.com VideoDialogzitateFun-Ecke
Dies und dasPannenSoundtrackUlkiges im AbspannAlternativfassungenBezüge zu anderen TitelnHäufig gestellte Fragen (FAQ)Weitere Angaben
Zu kaufen bei...EinspielergebnisseStarttermineDrehorteTechnische AngabenLaserdisk(s)DVD(s)LiteraturNachrichtenartikelPromotionmaterial
Werbezeilentrailers and videosFilmplakateFotogalerieNicht-lokale Verknüpfungen
Spielorte und -zeitenOffizielle WebsitesVerschiedenes...Fotographiensound clipsvideo clipsHow the West Was Won (1962)
| Fotos (Alle 35 | Diashow) |
Übersicht
Drehbuchautor:
James R. Webb (written by) (suggested by the series "How the West Was Won" in LIFE magazine)mehr
Premierendatum:
20. Februar 1963 (USA) mehrWerbezeile:
A FABULOUS ROMANTIC ADVENTURE mehrPlot:
A family saga covering several decades of Westward expansion in the nineteenth century--including the Gold Rush, the Civil War, and the building of the railroads. full summary | add synopsisFilmpreise:
Won 3 Oscars. Another 6 wins & 5 nominations mehrNutzerkommentare:
HTWWW at the Cinerama Dome in Los Angeles mehrBesetzung
(Hauptdarsteller)| Carroll Baker | ... | Eve Prescott Rawlings | |
| Lee J. Cobb | ... | Marshal Lou Ramsey | |
| Henry Fonda | ... | Jethro Stuart | |
| Carolyn Jones | ... | Julie Rawlings | |
| Karl Malden | ... | Zebulon Prescott | |
| Gregory Peck | ... | Cleve Van Valen | |
| George Peppard | ... | Zeb Rawlings | |
| Robert Preston | ... | Roger Morgan | |
| Debbie Reynolds | ... | Lilith 'Lily' Prescott | |
| James Stewart | ... | Linus Rawlings | |
| Eli Wallach | ... | Charlie Gant | |
| John Wayne | ... | Gen. William Tecumseh Sherman | |
| Richard Widmark | ... | Mike King | |
| Brigid Bazlen | ... | Dora Hawkins | |
| Walter Brennan | ... | Col. Jeb Hawkins |
Weitere Details
Parents Guide:
Add content advisory for parentsLänge:
162 MinProduktionsland:
USAFarbe:
Farbe (Technicolor) (credited as Metrocolor)Seitenverhältnis:
2.20 : 1 mehrAltersfreigabe:
Canada:G | USA:G (re-rating) (1970) | USA:Approved (certificate #20143) | Portugal:M/12 | West Germany:12 (f) | Argentina:Atp | Australia:G | Chile:TE | Finland:K-16 | Norway:12 | Spain:7 | Sweden:11 | UK:PG (video rating) (1986) (cut) | UK:PG (video re-rating) (1995) (uncut) | UK:U (original rating)MOVIEmeter: 
Fun-Ecke
Dies und das:
This was one of only two films made in true Cinerama which were shown in regular theatres after their first runs. None of the previous Cinerama films were ever shown in regular theatres because they were travelogues and documentaries made only to show off the process, as opposed to telling a story, and it would have been pointless to show these in a "regular" format. mehrPannen:
Anachronismus: The Civil War has recently ended (April-May 1865) and the Union Veteran older brother is leaving the family farm/homestead in Ohio to his younger brother. However, in the very next scene the Pony Express is mentioned, which ended about 3-1/2 years earlier in October 1861. mehrBezüge zu anderen Titeln:
Verweis/Anspielung/Erwähnung in "The Golden Girls: Yes, We Have No Havanas (#4.1)" (1988) mehrSoundtrack:
What Was Your Name in The States? mehrHäufig gestellte Fragen (FAQ)
This FAQ is empty. Add the first question.mehr
Diskussionsforen
Discuss this title with other users on IMDb Diskussionsforum für How the West Was Won (1962) mehrEmpfehlungen
Wenn Ihnen dieser Film gefallen hat, empfehlen wir:
Zeigen Sie mehr Empfehlungen
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
| The Phantom Rider | Dances with Wolves | Jesse James at Bay | The Outlaw Josey Wales | Custer's Last Stand |
|
IMDb Nutzer-Bewertung:
|
IMDb Nutzer-Bewertung:
|
IMDb Nutzer-Bewertung:
|
IMDb Nutzer-Bewertung:
|
IMDb Nutzer-Bewertung:
|
Weitere Links
| Besetzung und Stab | Beteiligte Firmen | Externe Kritiken |
| Nachrichtenartikel | IMDb Western section | IMDb USA section |
| Add this title to MyMovies |

















It was a good payoff; the print was as perfect as could be expected and the Pacific Cinerama theater is in top form. Seating was fine (it's reserved, so you know ahead where you'll be. Because you're looking at three separate 35mm projections, the sum total of the three result in a very large, clear and bright picture, just as good as a 70mm film, and perhaps better in some respects. The prints were vivid and sharp.
At the Dome, a theater executive came out to discuss the film and the theater history with the audience just prior to the start of the picture; he spoke for 10-15 minutes discussing the pros and cons of the process, why it wasn't practical to continue making films this way etc. One of the plus aspects is that with the small lenses they used, the focus was fixed and any object from 2 ft to infinity was always in focus (therefore, all the scenery was sharp except for certain single-camera and process shots). One of the downside aspects is that extreme closeups are not possible in Cinerama, and he said that the directors hated that. Then he tells inside trivia about the film, how it includes about a minute of footage from two other films (one was The Alamo) because the scenes fit perfectly in the storyline. He also mentioned that back in the 1960's it took 5 people to run the show: three projectors, the 35mm sound projector and one master projectionist - total of 5. The gentleman said that today, with all the modern technological improvements, they were now able to produce the identical result -- with just 5 projectionists! In other words, nothing had changed. Another reason the process could not survive. Got a big laugh. He then introduced each projectionist to the audience.
Anyway, the whole thing came off without a hitch and I had forgotten much of the film's vivid details and incredible scenery, so it was very much like seeing it for the first time. I had not seen it in Cinerama ever, and when I did see a blended 35mm print in a local Edwards theater back in '64, it was somewhat of a disappointment. The magnetic 6-track sound was on still another 35mm film strip, so 4 separate strips are actually required to comprise the presentation). The sound was fine - clear and sharp - with lots of separation in the six channels, but it was not as boomy as the sound we hear in today's pics. For anyone interested in what it might have been like to see a state-of-the-art presentation in the early 1960's, this presents a magnificent opportunity, and the film is a trip. --- DFR