Queen for a Day (1951)

Regisseur:

Arthur Lubin

Drehbuchautoren:

Faith Baldwin (story) and
John Ashworth (story) ...

Premierendatum:

7. Juli 1951 (USA)

Genre:

Komödie | Drama

Plot:

The film was based on the popular daytime Mutual Broadcasting Company radio program that originated from New York on April 30...

Plot Keywords:

Reward | Radio Studio | Los Angeles California | Independent Production | Italian

Nutzerkommentare:

Very well written and acted.

Besetzung

Jack Bailey	...	Jack Bailey - Studio Segment Program Host
Jim Morgan	...	Jim Morgan - Studio Segment
Ford Pearson	...	Ford Pearson - Studio Segment Program Announcer
Melanie York	...	First Contestant, studio segment
Cynthia Corley	...	Second Contestant, Studio segment
Kay Wiley	...	Third Contestant, Studio segment
Helen Mowery	...	Jan, Studio segment
Dian Fauntelle	...	Helena, Studio segment
Phyllis Avery	...	Marjorie, Gossamer World segment
Darren McGavin	...	Dan, Gossamer World segment
Rudy Lee	...	Pete, Gossamer World segment
Frances E. Williams	...	Anna, Gossamer World segment
Joan Winfield	...	Laura, Gossamer World segment
Lonnie Burr	...	Charles, Gossamer World segment (as Lonny Burr)
Tristram Coffin	...	Doctor, Gossamer World segment

Alternativ:

Horsie

Länge:

107 Min

Produktionsland:

USA

Sprache:

Englisch

Farbe:

Schwarzweiss

Seitenverhältnis:

1.37 : 1

Tonverfahren:

Mono

Altersfreigabe:

USA:Approved (PCA #15052)

Firma:

Robert Stillman Productions

Dies und das:

Feature film debut of Leonard Nimoy.

Pannen:

Faktische Fehler: An advertiser executive on the Queen For a Day program suggests that a nurse attend a live broadcast of the show on her night off, even though it's already been established that performances of the program take place during the afternoon.

Bezüge zu anderen Titeln:

Verweis/Anspielung/Erwähnung in "Biography: Leonard Nimoy: Spock and Beyond" (1996)

Very well written and acted.

This is sort of a film about a television show. At least a television show was the starting point for the trilogy of stories that comprise the body of the narrative. It was a television show that was originally a radio show that had very extremely popular. The producers felt it could make the transition, and it did, pretty well. The American public loved the format. Ordinary people wrote to the show asking for something that would make their lives a little easier. Usually it was a housewife asking for a new washing machine. It was something with which the audience could identify. As justification for being selected as the recipient of their heart's desire, they would describe their lives and try to show that they were worthy. In a sense, the show was a precursor for reality shows like Jerry Springer's, although not nearly as crass and tacky. But to get back to the film, the stories were written by three of the top American writers working at the time: Dorothy Parker, John Ashworth and Faith Baldwin. The stories were all excellent snapshots of contemporary American life. Dorothy Parker's pen was always dipped in acid and she was never happier that when she was ridiculing the class of people into which she was born. Parker's story was the one entitled, "Horsie". It concerned a nurse hired as a nanny for a newborn child. The child was born to a husband and wife who were too rich and stylish to ever attend to the mundane details of taking care of the child themselves, although I was surprised they had actually gone through a pregnancy. They seemed like the sort that would have hired that out as well. They do go on with their upper crust friends about how the experience has enriched them spiritually. Of course they do have a good deal of malicious fun at the expense of their sweet, innocent, unsuspecting nanny, simply because she is unattractive and unsophisticated. She doesn't realize she is the butt of their jokes and thinks they are wonderful. To her, they must be wonderful people because they are rich and smart (in the fashion sense). And the child, whom she loves so well, is being given such a wonderful life. The film, and Ms. Parker, is not making fun of poor Horsie. They are pointing up the cruelty and thoughtlessness of the people she works for. It is not Horsie who is depicted as being pathetic.